Re: [sword-devel] New public git mirror of Sword SVN trunk and why

2012-12-17 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 17/12/12 21:13, Jaak Ristioja wrote: > The Mirror > == > > I created a new git mirror of the SVN trunk of Sword at gitorious: > > Gitorious web page: > > https://gitorious.org/sword-svn-mirrors/trunk Why don't you use https://gitorious.org/sword? I keep the project alive just for t

Re: [sword-devel] New public git mirror of Sword SVN trunk and why

2012-12-17 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
I deserve the rebuke for the release schedule. The release schedule was not even mentioned in the email to which I responded. The NASB ball was dropped by at least 2 volunteers before I personally took the task to finally make it happen (unwillingly, but I did commit and spend quite a bit of ti

Re: [sword-devel] New public git mirror of Sword SVN trunk and why

2012-12-17 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
"Troy A. Griffitts" writes: > I'm not quite sure why the rebellious nature of your email, instead of > a friendly conversation Troy, I can summarize with a pair of excruciatingly simple, personal examples why this sort of "rebellious" plan comes into play. I've got no relationship to it myself

Re: [sword-devel] cmake python

2012-12-17 Thread cricketc
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:40 PM, wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Greg Hellings > wrote: >> What does it seem to be doing improperly? That's a very broad >> statement. I pretty much don't build the tests because they aren't >> really kept up with and are intended to be a thing for peop

Re: [sword-devel] cmake python

2012-12-17 Thread cricketc
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Greg Hellings wrote: > What does it seem to be doing improperly? That's a very broad > statement. I pretty much don't build the tests because they aren't > really kept up with and are intended to be a thing for people actively > developing on the engine, not for pa

Re: [sword-devel] New public git mirror of Sword SVN trunk and why

2012-12-17 Thread Nic Carter
> 1) writing an alternative backend for BibleTime to replace Sword, sounds like a lot of work and that time could hopefully be better spent in other ways? :/ > 2) writing a better wrapper around Sword which would hide its > deficiencies, Both MacSword/Eloquent & PocketSword use wrappers, but

Re: [sword-devel] New public git mirror of Sword SVN trunk and why

2012-12-17 Thread Greg Hellings
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > Hi Jaak. Of course I would discourage confusing potential developers with > an unofficial fork of the SWORD library on gitorious. I have been maintaining a personal SWORD repository on github for quite some time now (github.com/greg-hel

Re: [sword-devel] New public git mirror of Sword SVN trunk and why

2012-12-17 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Hi Jaak. Of course I would discourage confusing potential developers with an unofficial fork of the SWORD library on gitorious. But I'm confused by your comments. My apologies if I have any outstanding commits in my queue from you which I haven't committed. Do I? My complaint against the B

Re: [sword-devel] New public git mirror of Sword SVN trunk and why

2012-12-17 Thread Chris Burrell
I would agree with the above with the caveat that some recent very good, very alive Apache projects are still using SVN, e.g. Hadoop, Accumulo, etc. Having said that Git makes collaborating that much easier, branches are cheap and easy, forks are easy, pulling & pushing changes back from a fork is

Re: [sword-devel] New public git mirror of Sword SVN trunk and why

2012-12-17 Thread Daniel Hughes
The use of SVN is increasingly viewed by opensource developers as an indication of the poor health of an opensource project. The traffic that I have seen here indicates that it is not the case for this project but it doesn't change the fact that it's use will warn potential developers away. On Tu

Re: [sword-devel] New public git mirror of Sword SVN trunk and why

2012-12-17 Thread Chris Burrell
Can I suggest we put this on github under the crosswire organisation? We already have JSword there... github.com/crosswire Chris On 17 December 2012 20:13, Jaak Ristioja wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello! > > The Mirror > == > > I created a new git mi

[sword-devel] New public git mirror of Sword SVN trunk and why

2012-12-17 Thread Jaak Ristioja
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello! The Mirror == I created a new git mirror of the SVN trunk of Sword at gitorious: Gitorious web page: https://gitorious.org/sword-svn-mirrors/trunk Git URLs: https://git.gitorious.org/sword-svn-mirrors/trunk.git git://gitoriou

Re: [sword-devel] cmake python

2012-12-17 Thread Greg Hellings
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Ben wrote: > Cool, thanks. Also, I was looking at the tests, and it didn't look to me > like cmake was building the tests directory properly, so I actually went > back to using the old build system. If you want to commit any changes to > build the tests, that would

Re: [sword-devel] cmake python

2012-12-17 Thread Ben
On 12/17/2012 12:40 AM, Greg Hellings wrote: On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Ben wrote: On 11/21/2012 10:27 PM, Ben wrote: Hello, A couple thoughts related to building python bindings with cmake: 1. /bindings/swig/python/setup.py has the following line: #!/usr/bin/python python Looks like t