On Jul 23, 2012, at 11:29 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson
wrote:
On 07/23/2012 06:26 PM, Chris Little wrote:
is bad because it uses a container element to represent a non-container,
and it abuses the semantics of the element for purely typographic purposes.
is bad because it employs a pr
Thanks DM,
Calming it may be to have someone understand me and carefully explain what's
going on "under the hood",
yet I was making an observation about what seemed to be required for any
paragraphed Bible,
even for one that could (in theory at least) be entirely without "section
divisions" and/or
On Jul 24, 2012, at 5:45 AM, David Haslam wrote:
> Quite so!
>
> Ignoring titles and all other preverse content for the purpose of this
> reply, I still find it strange that the only placement of the paragraph
> elements (in relation to verse eID and sID milestones) that works
> empirically with
Quite so!
Ignoring titles and all other preverse content for the purpose of this
reply, I still find it strange that the only placement of the paragraph
elements (in relation to verse eID and sID milestones) that works
empirically without causing widowed verse tags (in at least one front-end)
is a
Sent from my iPhone
Am 24.07.2012 um 09:58 schrieb Nic Carter :
>
>> True, indeed. However, when a problem tempts people to extend, bend, or
>> disregard the standard to get proper results, it might be wise to at least
>> consider if the standard itself has a problem, either in the mechanics
> True, indeed. However, when a problem tempts people to extend, bend, or
> disregard the standard to get proper results, it might be wise to at least
> consider if the standard itself has a problem, either in the mechanics of it
> or in the documentation and usage.
One cannot help but think o
Heya guys, quick InstallMgr question to do with thinking of switching PS to
start using two different module locations.
[Background]
I am about to switch PS to have 2 places where you can install modules to:
1) The first will be where so-called "built-in" modules are installed to, which
will
