Thanks Chris,
On the same module, there are 10 instances of ... surrounding Chinese
text,
each of which is without any Strongs or Morph elements within the tag pair.
Here are the locations:
There are also 9 instances of text items with a Morphology tag where there
is no Strongs tag for the sam
Yes, it's an error. That's outside the range of TVM codes also. The
ChiUn source text is considered a work in progress, so there are likely
many errors.
--Chris
On 9/12/11 3:24 AM, David Haslam wrote:
The module *ChiUn* (in CrossWire Av11n) uses *Robinson's* morphology tags in
the NT.
There
The module *ChiUn* (in CrossWire Av11n) uses *Robinson's* morphology tags in
the NT.
There is one exception, which I just spotted in Acts 8:23.
This contains an unexpected *Strong's* morphology tag G55219.
$$$Acts 8:23
我看出你正在苦膽之中，被罪惡捆綁。
Is this an error?
David
--
View this message in context:
Do you mean at http://www.crosswire.org/news.jsp ???
If so, now that I've figured out how the news works on the site, it's done...
:)
On 12/09/2011, at 5:14 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Nic, we should put this out in the news thread on CW.
>
> Peter
Nic, we should put this out in the news thread on CW.
Peter
On 12/09/11 04:23, Nic Carter wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
>> Congratulations Nic,
>
> Thanks. :)
>
>> Could I ask for more information on a couple of changes?
>> The release notes include "more fonts for displaying more Asian
>> languag
