Re: [sword-devel] osis2mod - problem with Greek Esther

2009-11-28 Thread Chris Little
Greek Esther (SFM book ESG, Sword-specific OSIS book EsthGr) starts with chapter 1 and ends with 16. This book is not present in the KJVA v11n. If your book starts with chapter 10 and ends with 16, it's the Additions to Esther (SFM book ADE, OSIS book AddEsth). This book IS present in the KJVA

[sword-devel] osis2mod - problem with Greek Esther

2009-11-28 Thread johnduffy
Hi, I've looked in the past for the Sword definition of the KJVA v11n, but now I am in need of it, particularly for ESG, S3Y, SUS, BEL. I have tried to make a module with Greek Esther and Daniel moved to the relevant additional books. However, osis2mod does not recognise ESG 10:4-13, and returns

Re: [sword-devel] Python bindings for libsword with SIP

2009-11-28 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Matthew Talbert wrote: > I think there is some confusion here. > > The only SWIG bindings that actually work are the Python bindings. The > others would need some work to even compile. It has been this way for > some time. > > swordweb uses the CORBA bindings, which are unrelated. You are right

Re: [sword-devel] Python bindings for libsword with SIP

2009-11-28 Thread Troy Melhase
> We have had the occasional bug in SWIG that has been worked around > (particularly in SWIG's iteration over STL types, which has the > unpleasant side effect of occasionally causing access violations). > It's also worth considering the overhead of converting types like > SWBuf to native Python ty

Re: [sword-devel] Python bindings for libsword with SIP

2009-11-28 Thread Matthew Talbert
I think there is some confusion here. The only SWIG bindings that actually work are the Python bindings. The others would need some work to even compile. It has been this way for some time. swordweb uses the CORBA bindings, which are unrelated. Matthew __

Re: [sword-devel] Python bindings for libsword with SIP

2009-11-28 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Jonathan Morgan wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Troy Melhase wrote: >>> We probably could replace SWIG with SIP, but it is unlikely we would >>> do it soon just because BPBible works and works now with what is >>> there. The changes you describe would be far more likely to benefit >>> t

Re: [sword-devel] Python bindings for libsword with SIP

2009-11-28 Thread Jonathan Morgan
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Troy Melhase wrote: >> We probably could replace SWIG with SIP, but it is unlikely we would >> do it soon just because BPBible works and works now with what is >> there.  The changes you describe would be far more likely to benefit >> the Python programmer working

Re: [sword-devel] I'd Like to Volunteer

2009-11-28 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Hi Troy! Welcome. [..] In creating the binding, I've become familiar with the C++ header files and found a few small things that should be changed. I'd like to start there, get those files a bit more tidy and documented. Assuming I send diffs, what format and to whom do I send them? Please s