> We've made a number of significant small changes to warrant a 1.6.1
> release. I believe many people are using SVN trunk, so we've had some
> good testing already. I'd like to wrap up a few outstanding issues:
>
> buffer limits re: clucene
> some warnings we could bypass
I'm not sure what you'
This is fixed in SVN, to the extent that encryption works on other
platforms. So osis2mod can encrypt compressed modules, but not
uncompressed (for example).
--Chris
Tim Chase wrote:
Hi Troy
Encryption working on the windows modules would be nice in 1.6.1
Thanks
Tim
-Original Message
Wasn't that a bug in OSIS2MOD as compiled for Windows?
-- David
Tim Chase-13 wrote:
>
> Hi Troy
>
> Encryption working on the windows modules would be nice in 1.6.1
>
> Thanks
>
> Tim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Troy A. Griffitts [mailto:scr...@crosswire.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, S
Chris Little is correct.
Both SWORD (SPW aka BibleCS) and BPBible give exactly the same code when
pasted into SC Unipad Lite. The first word of Mark 1:1 has the zwj for both
frontends.
Ergo - it is the rendering.
Explanation: What I did earlier was complicate things by comparing the
reported
Hi All
Another related issue with regards to zwj and zwnj is how these characters
are handled by the front end applications with regards to searching for
words. Why would it make a difference? Some words in devanagari script can
be spelled with or without the zwj character and still be valid. I
Words including the zwj is where the problem shows up. The zwnj works
correctly. I can provide several example words that have the zwj if it
would be helpful and examples of correct and incorrect renderings.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Chris Little [mailto:chris...@crosswire.org]
Se
Hi Troy
Encryption working on the windows modules would be nice in 1.6.1
Thanks
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Troy A. Griffitts [mailto:scr...@crosswire.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 2:24 PM
To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum
Subject: [sword-devel] SWORD 1.6.1
Hey guys,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Matthew Talbert wrote:
>> Sorry for the dumb question, what is av11n ?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Tonny Kohar
>
> Alternate versification. See
> http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Alternate_Versification
I have slightly updated that page to mention 1.6 rather than 1.5.12.
I presum
Hey guys,
We've made a number of significant small changes to warrant a 1.6.1
release. I believe many people are using SVN trunk, so we've had some
good testing already. I'd like to wrap up a few outstanding issues:
buffer limits re: clucene
some warnings we could bypass
Are there other minor
Before anyone starts making authoritative statements about ZWJ or ZWNJ
in various modules and their reflexes in front ends, I would like to see
some sort of proof that this is even relevant to the problem.
If ZWNJ is present in the module, it isn't being changed by Sword or by
BibleCS. If you
Everyone,
v11n already denoted Visualization.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numeronym#Second_Form_References
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numeronym#Second_Form_References
I just updated the Wikipedia page.
-- David
Tonny Kohar-2 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Pete
Zero Width Joiner and non-Joiner
We should gather the evidence we have collected about zwj & zwnj (in e.g.
Devanagari) by adding a new row in the table on this wiki page.
http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Choosing_a_SWORD_program#Module_Support
http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Choosing_a_SWORD_program#
The Qt site headlines has S60 (coming soon). See http://qt.nokia.com/
http://qt.nokia.com/
Would this mean that once it has appeared, it should be feasible to port
BibleTime to Symbian S60 based mobile phones?
If so, this might bring closure to the fact that we had nothing to offer nor
recomme
13 matches
Mail list logo
