On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:59 AM, DM Smith wrote:
> On 08/28/2009 09:25 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:36 AM, DM Smith wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 08/27/2009 03:32 PM, Matthew Talbert wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Peter von Kaehne
wrote:
>>>
I was thinking that the Thayer's module removal (and the BDB I think it
was for the Hebrew?) needs a FAQ entry. We don't get the question
often, since the modules have been gone a while but it might be worth
having. Does the wiki need any special permissions to edit (due to
spammers, etc)?
___
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
>
> Matthew Talbert wrote:
>> TCHAR is even more ambigous than wchar-t. if UNICODE is defined then
>> TCHAR is wchar-t. otherwise, it is plain char. I'm away form my
>> computer but clucene is definitely converting to utf16 or utf32
>> depen
David Haslam wrote:
This thread has strayed from the subject, which was (to remind everyone),
whether Miklos Zsido's Bible-Discovery program uses any of the open source
code from our stable, but outside the terms of the relevant license.
Is there a way to find out, without one of us forking ou
Matthew Talbert wrote:
> TCHAR is even more ambigous than wchar-t. if UNICODE is defined then
> TCHAR is wchar-t. otherwise, it is plain char. I'm away form my
> computer but clucene is definitely converting to utf16 or utf32
> depending on platform. so i think it is always proper unicode. one way
TCHAR is even more ambigous than wchar-t. if UNICODE is defined then
TCHAR is wchar-t. otherwise, it is plain char. I'm away form my
computer but clucene is definitely converting to utf16 or utf32
depending on platform. so i think it is always proper unicode. one way
or another, the field needs to
Thanks again Matthew. Writing quick for lack of time right now.
In general, we avoid the use of wchar_t because it is define differently
on different systems, making its intended use (as a unicode character)
holder at best essentially useless for anything other than UTF-16, and
at least confusing
>> We have methods to convert to both UTF-16 and UTF-32 in our engine,
>> which don't need a fixed length buffer, so I would like to replace:
>>
>> lucene_utf8towcs(wcharBuffer, content, MAX_CONV_SIZE);
>>
>> with a call to our code, if we can nail down exactly what clucene wants
>> in the resultan
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Thanks for investigating this Matthew. There shouldn't really be any
> repercussions to increasing this within reason, though I would like to
> find a way to remove this code if we can.
>
> Does anyone know if clucene REALLY wants a wchar
Thanks for investigating this Matthew. There shouldn't really be any
repercussions to increasing this within reason, though I would like to
find a way to remove this code if we can.
Does anyone know if clucene REALLY wants a wchar_t buffer, and if so,
what EXACTLY does it want?
wchar_t on window
Greg,
Your recollections are underscored by this section of the CrossWire wiki
User FAQ.
http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/EnduserFAQ#What_happened_to_the_Portuguese_module.3F
What happened to the Portuguese module?
See also http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Module_Requests#Portuguese Module
Requests
Adriano,
Two things are required:
1) A copy which may legally be converted into a module and distributed
(either a version without copyright, in the PD or for which the
copyright holders have given someone permission to create and
disseminate a copy). If the version you point to is, indeed, publ
Dear developers,
Why there is not an available version of the Bible in Portuguese?
What is necessary to develop it? Since we have an public domain Bible (as
http://www.biblegateway.com/versions/index.php?action=getVersionInfo&vid=25),
how to create the package?
Thanks.
_
On 08/28/2009 09:25 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:36 AM, DM Smith wrote:
On 08/27/2009 03:32 PM, Matthew Talbert wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Peter von Kaehnewrote:
David Haslam wrote:
Has anyone seen this site before?
htt
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:36 AM, DM Smith wrote:
> On 08/27/2009 03:32 PM, Matthew Talbert wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> David Haslam wrote:
>>>
Has anyone seen this site before?
http://www.bible-discovery.com/ Bible-Discovery
Referring to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copy_protection the Wikipedia page
about Copy protection , wouldn't there be a potential conflict of interest
between "Internet product activation" and the risk to Bible software users
in persecuted countries, if such a method were ever to be adopted?
--
Hmm, they acknowledge that the SWORD software is GPL licenced.
They also have links to CrossWire where you could download the sources.
Charging for pressing a CD, packaging and sending is valid.
Manfred
Am 28.08.2009 um 09:27 schrieb Wolfgang Schultz:
Hello,
there is an another commercial b
Ok,
but have they issue the source code of their "driver"?
wolfgang
http://zefania.blogspot.com/
http://zeugen-jehovas-dokumentation.blogspot.com/
2009/8/28 Manfred Bergmann :
> Hmm, they acknowledge that the SWORD software is GPL licenced.
> They also have links to CrossWire where you could
David Haslam wrote:
> It's not really like using SSL or SSH to protect monetary transactions or
> other secrets which both parties in the communication session have a vested
> interest (and often a legal or moral obligation) to keep secure, [before],
> during, and after the session. Ultimately, the
Hello,
there is an another commercial biblesoftware that uses sword modules.
they sell a "driver" for sword moduls in order to show the content in
their commercial biblesoftware "bibleworkshop"
http://www.bibleworkshop.de/sword-treiber-fuer-bibleworkshop-v.html
is selling this "driver" also in
David Haslam wrote:
> Is there a way to find out, without one of us forking out USD49 ?
Maybe asking him? I am pleased that he acknowledges CrossWire as source
of some of his modules, so maybe he will be quite happy to explain what
he using and what not.
Peter
__
This thread has strayed from the subject, which was (to remind everyone),
whether Miklos Zsido's Bible-Discovery program uses any of the open source
code from our stable, but outside the terms of the relevant license.
Is there a way to find out, without one of us forking out USD49 ?
And if the a
It's not really like using SSL or SSH to protect monetary transactions or
other secrets which both parties in the communication session have a vested
interest (and often a legal or moral obligation) to keep secure, [before],
during, and after the session. Ultimately, the security of https depends
The problem is more universal and serious than I originally thought.
SWORD indexed search is performing rather poorly against BT's. At any
rate, the biggest issue is the size given to MAX_CONV_SIZE in
swmodule.cpp. Here are some tests:
//default value of 2047
./search Finney "good" | wc
[0
24 matches
Mail list logo
