:)
Has anyone played with Google's new 'Salt'? Native Client (NaCl) Plugin?
http://code.google.com/p/nativeclient/
Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:10 PM, DM Smith wrote:
>> On Dec 12, 2008, at 12:23 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>>
>>> * Removed mention of cross platform appl
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:10 PM, DM Smith wrote:
>
> On Dec 12, 2008, at 12:23 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>
>> * Removed mention of cross platform applications, since it seems to me
>> utterly irrelevant when the user is choosing a platform to get
>> software for anyway.
>
> To me it is important.
DM Smith wrote:
> Peter,
> You probably know this but the "applications" page is broken. It
> throws a "tomcat" error.
> DM
Sorry about that. Fixed
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword
Peter,
You probably know this but the "applications" page is broken. It
throws a "tomcat" error.
DM
On Dec 12, 2008, at 6:58 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> The icon bar is fixed. I hope so at least.
>
> It has captions - thanks to mwtalbert for suggesting this.
>
> It works fine in FF, Opera, IE
The icon bar is fixed. I hope so at least.
It has captions - thanks to mwtalbert for suggesting this.
It works fine in FF, Opera, IE7 and Chrome
It fails not too maliciously displaywise in IE6 and can presumably still
get improved, but it works well enough on IE6
I replaced some icons which wer
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> You have already succeeded very well.
Thanks!
>
>> News - I would like to have more feedback on that.
>>
> What would the users want to see? Who they are, why they read our news?
> [..]
True, it is hard to guess.
> Each project would like to have a
> bit more visi
Am 11.12.2008 um 22:19 schrieb Eeli Kaikkonen:
> Manfred Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> This might be nitpicking but even though Java, QT, GTK, wxWindows and
>> TclTk may work without X on Mac, they are not considered "native"
>> concerning applications with GUI. Only Cocoa is. Carbon is dying,
>> too.
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> My whole aim is to make this website so that we can again largely forget
> about it.
>
>
You have already succeeded very well.
> News - I would like to have more feedback on that. Currently the news
> stream is pretty dull and not at all up to date. Chris (and Troy?)
Brian J. Dumont wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In trying to do some beta testing, the link to SwordWeb for beta modules:
>
> http://www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/swordweb/webapp
>
> seems down.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks
>
I forgot that was there!
My guess is that I need to recompile it. Don't know why it w
David Haslam wrote:
> Clicking on http://crosswire.org/applications.jsp
> http://crosswire.org/applications.jsp
>
> just caused
>
>
> HTTP Status 500 -
Sorted
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailma
Hi all,
In trying to do some beta testing, the link to SwordWeb for beta modules:
http://www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/swordweb/webapp
seems down.
Any ideas?
Thanks
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailm
Starting a new thread here, as things become otherwise again to complicated.
Complaints with the version yesterday were
1) Java not necessary
2) a page with all applications needed
3) some sensible way of choosing needed (several suggestions, including
a mockup gratefully received)
4) on narrow s
Clicking on http://crosswire.org/applications.jsp
http://crosswire.org/applications.jsp
just caused
HTTP Status 500 -
type Exception report
message
description The server encountered an internal error () t
DM Smith wrote:
> So, I don't think that a top level Java icon is necessary. Maybe a
> blurb or link link to a page on the main software page would suffice,
> but even that might not be necessary.
Ok, I take your word for that. I will remove the top link and see how I
can incorporate it other
On Dec 12, 2008, at 4:00 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Can I just ask for a consensus - do you consider the flaws you all
> described as so important that I should back out of having the website
> active as it is and put up the old page? Or is the criticism/
> suggestions
> I get an expression o
On Dec 12, 2008, at 2:47 AM, Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> BTW, I don't like the Java section - it's needed only if the Java apps
> run somewhere which is not already covered by other platforms. Are
> there any examples for that?
A long time ago, I ran JSword on an IBM Mainframe.
It has been working
On Dec 12, 2008, at 12:23 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> * Removed mention of cross platform applications, since it seems to me
> utterly irrelevant when the user is choosing a platform to get
> software for anyway.
To me it is important.
I have a Mac at home. Linux and Windows at work. I want th
Quoting Peter von Kaehne :
>
> Can I just ask for a consensus - do you consider the flaws you all
> described as so important that I should back out of having the website
> active as it is and put up the old page? Or is the criticism/suggestions
> I get an expression of basic satisfaction + a desi
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>> Possibly it is worth putting it somewhere, but I don't think it
>> deserves a front page mention, and it certainly makes it more text to
>> read (which is what I am trying to avoid). It's worth noting that if
>>
Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> Possibly it is worth putting it somewhere, but I don't think it
> deserves a front page mention, and it certainly makes it more text to
> read (which is what I am trying to avoid). It's worth noting that if
> you search for that Crosswire comes up first, but what is highli
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> Choose the icon for your platform: [Linux icon] [Windows icon]
> BibleTime TSPFW GnomeSword ...
ok. I will look into this
> BTW, I don't like the Java section - it's needed only if the Java
> apps run somewhere which is not already covered by other platforms.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>> More nitpicking (do what you like with it):
>>
>> "Bible Study Software
>>
>> We have an abundance of applications, small and large,..."
>>
>> If the section is entitled "Bible Study Software", I would expect a
>>
Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> More nitpicking (do what you like with it):
>
> "Bible Study Software
>
> We have an abundance of applications, small and large,..."
>
> If the section is entitled "Bible Study Software", I would expect a
> mention of software, rather than talking about applications.
>
Just a heads up:
We're planning some server upgrades this weekend (starting Friday
evening (GMT-7) sometime and suspect downtime of various services
throughout the weekend.
-Troy.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Eeli Kaikkonen
wrote:
> Quoting Jonathan Morgan :
>
>> More nitpicking (do what you like with it):
>>
>> "Bible Study Software
>>
>> We have an abundance of applications, small and large,..."
>>
>> If the section is entitled "Bible Study Software", I would expect a
25 matches
Mail list logo
