Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> By all means, *please* update the wiki page
Considering that domcox himself wants to hear some test results on use
of that repo, I would prefer that we wait for at least one positive
report before we update info for public consumption. I would hate for
I am very interested in the EeePC. Anyone having comments and experiences
they would care to express, please forward to me off-line. I am looking at
this unit for a number of preacher students (in coming freshmen, and
soon-to-be graduates) as a very reasonably priced unit for beginning their
work
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> We have a wiki page regarding Eee PC running Linux.
>
> The downside of that page's recommendation to use the standard Debian
> repos is that the version of GnomeSword present there is chronically way
> out of date. domcox' builds
On Jul 13, 2008, at 9:34 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> We have a wiki page regarding Eee PC running Linux.
>
> The downside of that page's recommendation to use the standard Debian
> repos is that the version of GnomeSword present there is chronically
> wa
DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have a wiki page regarding Eee PC running Linux.
The downside of that page's recommendation to use the standard Debian
repos is that the version of GnomeSword present there is chronically way
out of date. domcox' builds are always very recent.
GS' curren
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 04:04:14PM -0400, DM Smith wrote:
>
> On Jul 13, 2008, at 12:18 PM, fred smith wrote:
>
> > Perhaps I should have sent this to sword-users... if so, my
> > apologies up-front,
> > but I never see any trafic there so I figured I'd try here.
> >
> > I'm on the waiting list
DM Smith wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2008, at 2:59 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>
>> DM Smith wrote:
>>> I am the bureaucrat. So is Chris. Troy is the "ueber" bureaucrat.
>>
>> Could you then change regular wiki writers etc into admins? Makes it
>> easier to roll back, and allows us to delete pages and b
I have a Motorola Q9m and I have both a scroll wheel and navigation buttons.
The scroll wheel acts as if someone presses the up or down keys and the
navigation button acts as if someone pressed the left/right/up/down keys.
I haven't looked at the code for scrolling, but in the current build if I
u
On Jul 13, 2008, at 2:59 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>
> DM Smith wrote:
>> I am the bureaucrat. So is Chris. Troy is the "ueber" bureaucrat.
>
>
> Could you then change regular wiki writers etc into admins? Makes it
> easier to roll back, and allows us to delete pages and ban vandals.
> That
On Jul 13, 2008, at 12:18 PM, fred smith wrote:
> Perhaps I should have sent this to sword-users... if so, my
> apologies up-front,
> but I never see any trafic there so I figured I'd try here.
>
> I'm on the waiting list at Amazon for an EEEPC 901, white, Linux.
> Wondering
> if there are an
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:28:30PM -0400, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> fred smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm on the waiting list at Amazon for an EEEPC 901, white, Linux. Wondering
> > if there are any Sword packages already made for that flavor of LInux or
> > if I'll need to create my own?
>
DM Smith wrote:
> I am the bureaucrat. So is Chris. Troy is the "ueber" bureaucrat.
Could you then change regular wiki writers etc into admins? Makes it
easier to roll back, and allows us to delete pages and ban vandals. That
woudl be brilliant.
Peter
> -- DM
>
>
> ___
fred smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm on the waiting list at Amazon for an EEEPC 901, white, Linux. Wondering
> if there are any Sword packages already made for that flavor of LInux or
> if I'll need to create my own?
domcox made this comment to gnomesword-developers last week:
| I'll be g
Perhaps I should have sent this to sword-users... if so, my apologies up-front,
but I never see any trafic there so I figured I'd try here.
I'm on the waiting list at Amazon for an EEEPC 901, white, Linux. Wondering
if there are any Sword packages already made for that flavor of LInux or
if I'll n
John,
This is strange because the swordlib and SwordReader both compile on eVC
3. Not sure why you are getting errors. I am off to church. I will look
into it more later this afternoon.
--
David
SonWon wrote:
> When I try to build, I am getting this error with EVC3 and eVC4:
>
> C:\CrossWire\swo
When I try to build, I am getting this error with EVC3 and eVC4:
C:\CrossWire\sword\src\keys\versetreekey.cpp(121) : error C2352:
'sword::TreeKey::PositionChangeListener::getTreeKey' : illegal call of
non-static member function
..\..\..\sword\include\treekey.h(58) : see declaration of
'
"Daniel Glassey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are 2 Norwegian languages, I assume this means the module is in
> Bokmål rather than Nynorsk
Cool, that would have never occurred to me...The good side effect is
that you've induced me both to update GS' language listings as well as
to rework ho
I would rather not have the noise. :)
I'll see if it is affecting the EVC4 build in a little bit.
David Trotz wrote:
> John,
> My eVC 3 has these errors as well but if you let it run through you will
> find they are not critical enough to lead to a broken build. You will
> still get a sword.dl
John,
My eVC 3 has these errors as well but if you let it run through you will
find they are not critical enough to lead to a broken build. You will
still get a sword.dll in the end.
As far as commenting the line out I suggest you do not do that. The file
is part of the sword library and thus th
When I Rebuild All using EVC3 I get many errors like this:
Could not find file mem.h
If I remember correctly this is needed for a DOS build not windows. So
I rem the line out in swbuf.h (A Sword function) and now all of the
mem.h errors are gone. Do we need to just rem this out or is there a
On Jul 12, 2008, at 10:01 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> DM Smith wrote:
>>
>> Feel free to help us block spammers and rolling back their junk.
>
> That requires admin access. Former at least. Who is "buerocrat" on
> the wiki?
I am the bureaucrat. So is Chris. Troy is the "ueber" bureaucrat.
2008/7/13 Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I see there's a v1.5 update to Norsk available.
>
> It has changed Lang=no to Lang=nb. Why?
There are 2 Norwegian languages, I assume this means the module is in
Bokmål rather than Nynorsk
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_language
Regar
I thought SmartPhones had a virtual mouse? Can you flick scroll with a
virtual mouse? We can always add functions into the navigate menu. I
think we will need to build functions into the menus for anything we can
do with a stylus.
Daniel Blake wrote:
> I like Troy's idea for using flick scro
I think this is a good idea.
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> How about just flick scroll to the next chapter? A flick scroll would
> stop, as it currently does, at the bounds of a chapter, but if at the
> bounds, then another flick scroll in that same direction would take you
> to the adjoining cha
I like Troy's idea for using flick scroll also. I'm not sure what to do
for SmartPhones though..
Barry Drake wrote:
> Hi Troy .
>
> Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
>
>> How about just flick scroll to the next chapter? A flick scroll would
>> stop, as it currently does, at the bounds of a c
Hi Troy .
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> How about just flick scroll to the next chapter? A flick scroll would
> stop, as it currently does, at the bounds of a chapter, but if at the
> bounds, then another flick scroll in that same direction would take you
> to the adjoining chapter.
Hey
I see there's a v1.5 update to Norsk available.
It has changed Lang=no to Lang=nb. Why?
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at ab
How about just flick scroll to the next chapter? A flick scroll would
stop, as it currently does, at the bounds of a chapter, but if at the
bounds, then another flick scroll in that same direction would take you
to the adjoining chapter.
___
sword-de
28 matches
Mail list logo
