Hi,
Instead of:
>>> from Sword import *
>>> mf = MarkupFilterMgr(FMT_WEBIF)
>>> mgr = SWMgr(mf)
Try
>>> from Sword import *
>>> mf = MarkupFilterMgr(FMT_WEBIF)
>>> mf.thisown = False
>>> mgr = SWMgr(mf)
mf.thisown = False tells swig not to GC the sword object.
This may or may not help. I have
I've got my _Sword.so module to compile and I statically linked
libsword.a and libclucene.a into it. So far, I'm able to create the
objects fine, but when I try to get my modules, Python crashes with
the following trace:
Process: Python [3639]
Path:/System/Library/Framew
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> A good point that hadn't occurred to me (I'm still very much an ASCII
> man). For Sword, UTF-8 might end up best, but technically it is one
> of the worst formats possible. Its only redeeming feature is that it
> allows existing 7-bit ASCII to work un
Since I'm experimenting with Cocoa/Python and am now able to use the
python bindings for sword, I'm wondering if I shouldn't just
statically link libsword.a into _Sword.so. Would that make it easier
to integrate into my OS X app, since I'll be using python for the guts
of the application? I
Hi Barry.
> I've begun work on a simple commandline version for a modules installer
> for SwordReader If any of
> you have SwordReader running on a working pocket pc that uses ActiveSync
> to connect to a pc, maybe you could try it out and see where we are
> going so far.
>
> It does not yet i
On Dec 20, 2007 12:11 AM, Eeli Kaikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, DM Smith wrote:
> > I see them as the same thing from an implementation level. The
> > application is free to use the mechanism in various ways: Bookmarks,
> > Topic lists, saved state, . How the applicat
On Dec 19, 2007 11:50 PM, Eeli Kaikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> > Just so that there is no confusion over what I see the semantics of a
> > hierarchical structure to be, here are my proposed semantics:
> > 1. Any topic may contain verses (referenc
On Dec 19, 2007 11:24 PM, Eeli Kaikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for comments, I have to say that you have probably thought this
> more thoroughly than I have. Your point of view is valid throughout but
> I still try to give a second opinion...
>
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Jonathan Morgan w
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, DM Smith wrote:
> I see them as the same thing from an implementation level. The
> application is free to use the mechanism in various ways: Bookmarks,
> Topic lists, saved state, . How the application presents them to
> the user gives the appearance of transience or perman
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> Just so that there is no confusion over what I see the semantics of a
> hierarchical structure to be, here are my proposed semantics:
> 1. Any topic may contain verses (references if you want to be more
> generic) and sub-topics.
> 2. The verses are ord
On Dec 19, 2007 1:18 AM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jonathan Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The main difference in ideas is that trees
> > attempt to make users organise their information in a hierarchical
> > manner, while tagging does not. I have a few problems with
Thanks for comments, I have to say that you have probably thought this
more thoroughly than I have. Your point of view is valid throughout but
I still try to give a second opinion...
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> There are a few good reasons (at least in theory) for being more spec
12 matches
Mail list logo
