I have to say that I haven't really played with the bookmarks much.
I use verse lists all the time. I save them in topic folders to go back
to over and over.
I have my students use them. I tell them to find all the verses on a
given subject a week before I am going to teach on it. Then make sub
t
That did it!
Now I've copied the Sword.py module and _Sword.so into a working
directory and am able to use the command-line python to manipulate it.
My next question is, how is this going to work in a self-contained
project? I'm guessing it's finding the sword library at /usr/local/
sword/
Hi,
Try make pythonswig in the package directory before doing make python_make.
This will generate that file.
--
God Bless,
Ben
---
The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness,
but is p
Jonathan Gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2. Which standard (OSIS or ThML) would you recommend and why?
Pro-OSIS: OSIS is considered the best format with which to work for Bibles
in Sword Project modules at this point, though ThML support continues.
Pro-ThML: The existing ISV NT Sword modul
I'm creating a Python program that will compare two versions of the ISV Bible.
My main objective is to find out what changes have been made on the verse level
(text and format). The original text is in Word 2007 XML format. I'm planning
to convert the text to either OSIS or ThML prior to comp
I've got 10.5.1 of Leopard (with Developer tools, obviously :) and I
can compile clucene and sword just fine. I put it in /usr/local/sword
Then I went into the bindings/swig/ directory, read the README,
followed the steps therein and got a few errors:
+-( ~/src/sword-1.5.10/bindings/swig/pack
"Jonathan Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The main difference in ideas is that trees
> attempt to make users organise their information in a hierarchical
> manner, while tagging does not. I have a few problems with the idea
> of hierarchical passage lists. You may say that they are more
>
"Jonathan Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Possibly they are implemented in the same way, but, coming along as
> the user, I see a "bookmark" as a mark for something that I want to go
> back to, and so a relatively temporary thing. [...] On the other
> hand, I would view "verse lists" as a mo
On Dec 18, 2007, at 7:28 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2007 6:27 AM, Eeli Kaikkonen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
>>
>>> Martin Gruner wrote:
Will this be a part of Sword?
Troy, what do you say?
>>>
>>> Since most of our f
On Dec 17, 2007, at 1:32 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Martin Gruner wrote:
>> Will this be a part of Sword?
>>
>> Troy, what do you say?
>
> Since most of our frontends have some type of verse list
> functionality,
> I would like for us to have something common in the engine we can all
> use.
On Dec 18, 2007 6:27 AM, Eeli Kaikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
>
> > Martin Gruner wrote:
> > > Will this be a part of Sword?
> > >
> > > Troy, what do you say?
> >
> > Since most of our frontends have some type of verse list functionality,
> > I
On Dec 18, 2007 5:32 AM, Troy A. Griffitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Gruner wrote:
> > Will this be a part of Sword?
> >
> > Troy, what do you say?
>
> Since most of our frontends have some type of verse list functionality,
> I would like for us to have something common in the engine we c
12 matches
Mail list logo
