Assuming it works, can we move the module BAO out of beta?
On Sep 7, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Chris Little wrote:
> Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
>> WinSword, of course, doesn't yet do images at all, and I really
>> think it
>> needs the ability.
>
> As with other engine-related features, BibleCS supported
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, jonathon wrote:
> One start would be to rewrite the wikipedia articles for The Sword
> Project,,GnomeSword, etc.
> ( I also expect them all to be renominated for AfD status in the near future.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Sword_Project
Yo
Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I couldn't guess why it's broken at the moment.
Hm, interesting. I've been involved with Sword things since April '06,
and I have never seen the Windows UI do images. So it has been broken
for at least the duration of the 1.5.8 and now 1.5.9 releases.
Karl wrote:
> We need more and better PR such as the article Troy mentioned today.
One start would be to rewrite the wikipedia articles for The Sword
Project,,GnomeSword, etc.
( I also expect them all to be renominated for AfD status in the near future.)
xan
jonathon
__
On 9/8/07, Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> > WinSword, of course, doesn't yet do images at all, and I really think it
> > needs the ability.
>
> As with other engine-related features, BibleCS supported images first. I
> couldn't guess why it's broken at the moment
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> WinSword, of course, doesn't yet do images at all, and I really think it
> needs the ability.
As with other engine-related features, BibleCS supported images first. I
couldn't guess why it's broken at the moment.
--Chris
___
s
I would like to suggest a new "Feature" in the conf of "Images" to
indicate that the module has images.
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> I hesitate to ask for much more in the way of new feature support,
> considering that Troy has graciously reacted so well to my previous
> agitation about a new release
Hi Karl,
please enter this into our feature request tracker at sourceforge.
We'll add it when we have the time.
mg
am Freitag, 7. September 2007 um 15:24 schrieben Sie:
> I hesitate to ask for much more in the way of new feature support,
> considering that Troy has graciously reacted so well to
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> also, I am aware that BibleTime does images, but doesn't
> offer resizing, which is a feature that I wish that crew would consider.
This sounds like a must-have feature. If we only would get the KDE 4
porting done soon! Then we could think about feature
I hesitate to ask for much more in the way of new feature support,
considering that Troy has graciously reacted so well to my previous
agitation about a new release, but let me just put a bug in folks' ears
about the need for improvements to image support in Sword Project UIs.
Peter (refdoc) recen
I went surfing for anybody who's done reviews of Sword Project UIs. I
came across this:
http://www.fostertribe.org/biblesoftware.html
Regarding Sword Project, quote:
"For instance, the portion of the About box that describes TSP's freely
distributable status contains this gem: `write a tract mod
"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[well, forwards]
> Bible Time appears to be more mature than GNOMESword, but mostly,
> choosing between them is more a matter of taste.
harumph!
:-)
I would disagree as to maturity -- I think they're pretty comparable in
that regard, and of course
http://blue-gnu.biz/content/crosswire_bible_society_offers_free_libre_bible_software_anyone_can_use
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your sett
13 matches
Mail list logo
