"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you would like to be listed, please add your repository to the page.
I added a couple entries.
Do you not want the Crosswire module beta area to be listed?
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@c
Hello everyone,
I've been working on some Bible software for Linux (and also Windows) called
Aletheia. It's lightweight as it uses the wxWidgets interface framework for
its frontend, and it also uses the SWORD. I had a request from an Ubuntu
developer for making this work under Linux, so that's m
OK guys,
I spent today trying to revive out WIKI. I believe it is back in
commission at:
http://crosswire.org/wiki
I added a module repository page at:
http://crosswire.org/wiki/index.php/Module_Repositories
And I updated the frontpage with a link to such.
If you would like
I agree. We should have a page listing known module repositories. We
actually say there is one in the README at:
http://crosswire.org/ftpmirror/pub/sword/iso/latest/Windows/readme.txt
to quote the relevant paragraph:
Remote sources can also be added by selecting the
'Manage Remote Sou
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Eeli Kaikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well... OK. You don't find a problem with the Heretics or Orthodoxy
> module names? They're not very well differentiated in 1 word, and
> Chesterton is surely not the only one to have written on those
> s
My current convention is:
[NCTM_GCB_Ephesians031]
^ ^ ^ ^
| | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | Book name
| Author (Initials)
Organisation
but, that's just me, (I'm, still developing them), and after the
commentaries are done, and the licencing issues are worked
Eeli Kaikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have one objection: "Systematic Theology" is too common a name. The
> module names should be differentiated from the start up.
Well... OK. You don't find a problem with the Heretics or Orthodoxy
module names? They're not very well differentiated in
It seems to be quite common problem that people don't have icu
installed and then they don't know what went wrong with compiling. Maybe
it could be informed in README file and/or somewhere else so that they
and we are saved from extra work of help?
Even better would be to change the build system s
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> I think a reference resource page like this will be both essential and
> invaluable.
I agree. And thanks for your work!
> single module, SysTheo, at my server noted above,
I have one objection: "Systematic Theology" is too common a name. The
module n
