Hi,
On 10/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I believe I have a solution for the problems building sword-1.5.9 with ICU.
Hmm, AFAIK, there is no problem building sword-1.5.9 with icu
> Tests were failing to build properly. The attached patch solved the comp
Hello everyone,
I believe I have a solution for the problems building sword-1.5.9 with ICU.
Tests were failing to build properly. The attached patch solved the compile
errors in Unicode streams for me, maybe it will for everyone else hopefully
including Fedora Core users.
A good test to see your
L.Allan-pbio wrote:
> Some observations (none major ... good work):
>
Thanks.
> * nit ... Crosswire license mentions copyright 1994-2005 ... should
> this be 2006? (the Help About for sword.exe itself has 2006)
>
Good catch.
> * SWORD_PATH environment variable over-written ... should per
I also don't understand why the InstallManager fields can't be
pre-filled with default, valid info. Why would this convenience cause
risks? I can understand if they proceed to get modules, but not why it
is a risk just the convenience of prefilling a rather obscure part of
The SWORD Project (if
Some observations (none major ... good work):
* nit ... Crosswire license mentions copyright 1994-2005 ... should
this be 2006? (the Help About for sword.exe itself has 2006)
* SWORD_PATH environment variable over-written ... should permission
be asked to do this if one already exists (makes in