Re: [sword-devel] NetSword -- Take 2

2006-08-18 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Hey (not sure your name), I can't stress enough how much I appreciate your ambition but would discourage your efforts in this direction. We have spent quite a bit of time developing a tuned crossplatform framework with bindings for other languages. If you would like to work in the .net wo

[sword-devel] NetSword -- Take 2

2006-08-18 Thread veritosproject
I started to implement NetSword from scratch again, but this time I'm using the real Sword library instead of JSword. Based on the limitations of C#, I'm taking quite a few liberties with the code (using properties instead of get* and set* functions, removing unused stuff, no operator overloading

Re: [sword-devel] NetSword

2006-08-18 Thread veritosproject
Alright, I'll move over to regular Sword. Probably be easier too b/c I don't have to deal with Java's quirks. On 8/17/06, Jonathan Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 18/08/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have started to port Sword (actually JSword) to the .NET Framework

Re: [sword-devel] Python instead of C# as .Net port/rewrite of Java JSword Re: NetSword

2006-08-18 Thread veritosproject
Oops...I already have quite a bit of code written. Actually, though, I don't really need very much help...just a few quirks, but that's to be expected with such a project. I will do my best to keep it in the standard Framework though, so that it runs on Mono and such too. On 8/17/06, J H Stovall

Re: [sword-devel] NKJV

2006-08-18 Thread DM Smith
Simon Quantrill wrote: > I have the NKJV on my hard disk from a windows dvd I bought I would like > to use it using sword on linux, It seems as though its just converting > it but Im not to sure how here is the structure > You will need to look at the license that accompanied the Bible to see

[sword-devel] NKJV

2006-08-18 Thread Simon Quantrill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have the NKJV on my hard disk from a windows dvd I bought I would like to use it using sword on linux, It seems as though its just converting it but Im not to sure how here is the structure first there is a lot of html stuff then this Ezekiel's Vi

Re: [sword-devel] KJV2006 with files dated Aug 11: Curious about what has changed.

2006-08-18 Thread DM Smith
I rebuilt it with the latest osis2mod and the conf gives a minimum sword version of 1.5.9. The sword engine now has support for ignoring notes of type x- strongsMarkup, so I'll be rebuilding one last time to put those back in. On Aug 18, 2006, at 6:35 AM, L.Allan-pbio wrote: > DM, > > I notice

Re: [sword-devel] ESV update on Aug 11. Is this 3rd beta?

2006-08-18 Thread DM Smith
Rebuilt with the latest osis2mod and conf gives a minimum sword version of 1.5.9. On Aug 18, 2006, at 6:28 AM, L.Allan-pbio wrote: > DM, > > I noticed your webpage has a revised version of the ESV with files > dated Aug 11, 2006. > http://crosswire.org/~dmsmith/esv/ > > Is this a 3rd beta? The

[sword-devel] KJV2006 with files dated Aug 11: Curious about what has changed.

2006-08-18 Thread L.Allan-pbio
DM, I noticed your webpage has a revised version of the KJV2006 with files dated Aug 11, 2006. http://crosswire.org/~dmsmith/kjv2006/ Is this an update from the version that had files dated July 24, 2006? Can you describe the differences between this version and the one from late July, por fav

[sword-devel] ESV update on Aug 11. Is this 3rd beta?

2006-08-18 Thread L.Allan-pbio
DM, I noticed your webpage has a revised version of the ESV with files dated Aug 11, 2006. http://crosswire.org/~dmsmith/esv/ Is this a 3rd beta? The "summary page" indicates it is the 2nd beta, but is this one different from the one with files dated July 24? http://crosswire.org/~dmsmith/ Can