[sword-devel] Food for thought regarding OSIS and some of its alternatives...

2006-02-06 Thread Kahunapule Michael Johnson
Why Use OSIS When USFM and USFX Work Better? By (Kahunapule) Michael Johnson, http://kahunapule.org 6 February 2006 Conclusion OSIS is a poor choice for a standard Scripture archiving, authoring, and interchange format for members of the Forum of Bible Translation Agencies. Its inadequacies can

Re: [sword-devel] inquring about an official WEB update and also the gbf to osis converter....

2006-02-06 Thread Kahunapule Michael Johnson
Chris Little wrote: > The text derives from the OSIS document on ebible.org (with only the > header and apocrypha removed before running the importer), so it isn't > conformant OSIS 2.1. But there is some chatter about changing the > standard in various ways to accomodate presentational quotation m

Re: [sword-devel] SWIG Bindings

2006-02-06 Thread David Blue (Mailing List Addy)
On Monday 06 February 2006 13:46, Jason Turner wrote: > I am curious who all out there is currently using the SWIG bindings > for sword, with which languages? I am also wondering what the current > need/desire is to have the CSharp version working with mono and gcc? I don't but I could never get t

Re: [sword-devel] SWIG Bindings

2006-02-06 Thread Jason Turner
I will probably work on getting the modifying the bindings/swig Makefile soon to get the csharp wrappers compiling on unix systems soon, but I wanted to know how important it was so I could prioritize my time. God Bless, Jason On 2/6/06, Greg Marine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, and I would lo

Re: [sword-devel] SWIG Bindings

2006-02-06 Thread Greg Marine
Oh, and I would love to see this work with Mono. IMHO, making it compatible with just MS .NET would be my first priority, though. That is because there are 2 great Linux Sword projects. But, if it will work with Mono, that would be great too! On 2/6/06, Greg Marine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have

Re: [sword-devel] SWIG Bindings

2006-02-06 Thread Greg Marine
I haven't done this yet, but you can build .NET 1.1 and 1.0 with VS2005. The following link has the how-to:http://weblogs.asp.net/rmclaws/archive/2005/06/04/410360.aspx On 2/6/06, Wade Maxfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:   C# is an ECMA language.  Mono fully supports that language in version 1.1. 

Re: [sword-devel] SWIG Bindings

2006-02-06 Thread Wade Maxfield
  C# is an ECMA language.  Mono fully supports that language in version 1.1.  The version 2.0 is not there yet, if I remember correctly. (http://www.mono-project.com)  The key difference between mono and Microsoft's implementation is that Microsoft supports Windows Forms.  Mono does not yet support

Re: [sword-devel] BibleCS Installer

2006-02-06 Thread DM Smith
L.Allan-pbio wrote: From SwordSetup.nis ; ; Establish and remember the Start MenuGroup info !define MUI_STARTMENUPAGE_DEFAULT_FOLDER "$[PRODUCT_TITLE}" ; Remember where it is !define MUI_STARTMENUPAGE_REGISTRY_ROOT HKLM !define MUI_STARTMENU

[sword-devel] BibleCS Installer

2006-02-06 Thread L.Allan-pbio
From SwordSetup.nis     ;  ; Establish and remember the Start MenuGroup info  !define MUI_STARTMENUPAGE_DEFAULT_FOLDER "$[PRODUCT_TITLE}"  ; Remember where it is  !define MUI_STARTMENUPAGE_REGISTRY_ROOT  HKLM  !define MUI_STARTMENUPAGE_REGISTRY_KEY   

Re: [sword-devel] SWIG Bindings

2006-02-06 Thread Greg Hellings
Working under mono/gcc would be a good goal for XP (as in cross-platform, not as in WinXP) programs.  However, since the goal of Mono (I think) is to be compatible with C# and not vice-versa, if you don't have Mono support you might not be too bad off, since Mono might come around closer to C#/.NET

[sword-devel] Compiled PHP SWIG Binding

2006-02-06 Thread Dean Montgomery
After searching the mailing list archives and google I was unable to find how to create a Sword module for php. So last Sunday, I debugged the swig-generated Sword.cxx so that it would compile as a php module. I was able to get swig to compile a Sword module for php. I can see all the class

Re: [sword-devel] SWIG Bindings

2006-02-06 Thread Matt Reimer
On 2/6/06, Jason Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am curious who all out there is currently using the SWIG bindings > for sword, with which languages? I am also wondering what the current > need/desire is to have the CSharp version working with mono and gcc? I'm using the python swig bindings

[sword-devel] SWIG Bindings

2006-02-06 Thread Jason Turner
I am curious who all out there is currently using the SWIG bindings for sword, with which languages? I am also wondering what the current need/desire is to have the CSharp version working with mono and gcc? God Bless, Jason -- http://emptycrate.com Games, Programming, Travel & other stuff __

Re: [sword-devel] BibleCS Installer

2006-02-06 Thread DM Smith
I have uploaded a current copy of the installer script that I am working on to: http://www.crosswire.org/bibledesktop/biblecs/biblecs/installer/SwordSetup.nsi I have also uploaded the installer: http://www.crosswire.org/bibledesktop/biblecs/biblecs/installer/SwordSetup.exe Give it a try and let

[sword-devel] Missing Method in LocaleMgr

2006-02-06 Thread Manfred Bergmann
Hi there. I am working on MacSword in my spare time, getting in touch with it and then the plan is making a universal binary for the mac platform. Well actually most of the work is done already. There are however some issues that I am confronted with: With using sword 1.5.8 it seems there no