Hi
I really like the direction you are going with crosslinking different
resources. It didn't seem to work in the versions besides ASB. Also I
didn't see any morphologiical references, but frankly I didn't know what I
was looking for.
I am also wondering if there is a prettier way to format
Hey guys,
Thank you for the feedback. I will say once again for the newcomers,
in case they haven't realized it yet: I am terrible at making things
look pretty. Anything that looks good on swordweb is due to other
people writing nice CSS and HTML, etc. If anyone has graphic design
talent a
FYI - I did the exact same thing. Toggled the Footnotes on and
immediately scrolled to the bottom of the page to see them. It may not
be right, but I think most of us have been trained to think and expect
to find things that way.
Thanks for the work. It looks good.
Daniel Blake
DM Smith w
Looks good. Some thoughts.
In the NASB module each of the notes and cross references has an "n"
attribute which can be used for a marker. I don't know if the sword api
exposes them. If it does, you might want to use it.
In the "It's just my preference" category, I think that since you are
no
Troy,
I took a brief look at a passage I've been studying, and it looks very
nice. I really like the footnotes, especially.
Scott
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
A first attempt at footnote / crossref support is available for testing at:
http://crosswire.org/study/passagestudy.jsp
Notice 2 new to
