I have successfully compiled using VC++ 6.0. There are a few options
for the type of library I create. If you want a dll, I could probably
do that for you. Is that all you need or would the wrapper be better? I
would be very happy to work on a C# wrapper! That is once I find that
project I mentione
SWIG?
I don't know if the current version supports C#.
We already have some SWIG stuff in bindings/swig/.
Joachim
> There is a way to create a quick wrapper. I don't recall what the program
> is, but I'll post again once I remember. It is a system that will take a
> C++ library and created wrapp
There is a way to create a quick wrapper. I don't recall what the
program is, but I'll post again once I remember. It is a system that
will take a C++ library and created wrappers in several other languages
to interface with the library from those languages. I know it will
create a C# wrapper. That
I'm still working on it. A semi ran into my car this week and I'm in the
midst of midterms at school, so I'm a little busy. It will be done when
it's done.
--Chris
Ryan V wrote:
I didn't get a response to my previous inquring about the progress on
this gbf to osis converter, so I'll ask again
I didn't get a response to my previous inquring about the progress on
this gbf to osis converter, so I'll ask again...
How's the progress coming along on this GBF to OSIS converter? How
long will it be before official updates will be made to the modules
which currently use gbf markup (more specifi
Project files for VC++ (that is to say, the IDE) have been included with
Sword for a few years. At present, I think we ship them for 6.0 & 7.1. I
don't know whether they are necessarily up to date, but they should be
trivial to update if not.
--Chris
Greg Hellings wrote:
I have not yet been s
