Here is a starting thought on the format of the osis.
I took three simple cases:
The first is about as simple as they come, but has several Bible references.
The second adds an internal cross reference.
The third has several definitions.
First the original from hard copy: (I point out the hard c
Chris,
When I compared nave.dat to the zip from biblecom.net, I found only
a few differences. The Sword Module does not maintain the book order of
the words, but rather alphabetizes them with what appears to be an ascii
collation. And the cross references using the T456 notation are
rem
Joachim Ansorg wrote:
Hi,
thank you (and Chris) for your replies.
The osisRef can have an optional prefix followed by a colon. In your
example it is MyLexName. If it is not present the OSIS manual says that
it refers to the same work. So See
Eve is proper.
I understand that this also mean
Hi,
thank you (and Chris) for your replies.
> The osisRef can have an optional prefix followed by a colon. In your
> example it is MyLexName. If it is not present the OSIS manual says that
> it refers to the same work. So See
> Eve is proper.
>
> I understand that this also means that if we have r
This all looks correct. The only change I would make would be to move
the "See" out of the reference tag, but that's just a personal
preference (mainly because it will look the same whether you have one
link or a list of many links covered by one "See").
We're supposed to work on the OSIS refe
I am having trouble creating a ThML-based Commentary. If anyone
has a ThML which they have successfully imported as a commentary or as
a Bible text, might I be able to get a copy of it? Alternatively,
if there is info somewhere on the web, could someone point me to a
tutorial on how to create the
I am wondering the same thing as I work on Naves. Chris' response to me was:
"The article title itself should be used for osisIDs as well as osisRefs
to the entries with those osisIDs."
So I take it that your example is what he meant.
The osisRef can have an optional prefix followed by a colon.
Hi all,
I have to create a lexicon which contains links to it's own entries.
E.g. the text of "Adam" contains a ref to "Eve".
At the moment I did this with
See Eve
Is this good or bad style? Is this even valid? What is the right way to do
this.
An answer would be helpful, since the mo
MacSword 1.2 is finally here, bringing with it many new great
features including parallel bibles, personal commentary editing,
instant searching and the 1.5.8 sword API! Cheers guys.
The major changes in MacSword 1.2 are:
Editing and creation of modules
Vastly improved searching
Indexed
g'day,
I'd like to see a version with improved utf-8 support. I can quickly
test it but won't be able to take advantage of with Thai until your
August return though (because of other priorities for time).
ak
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
I have good and bad news. I've been accepted to attend a
10 matches
Mail list logo
