Under FC3/Firefox, the composed and decomposed forms show the same
behavior as under Firefox and WinXP. The composed has no problems. But
many of the accented characters are shorter. I guess that this makes
room for the accents. Under the decomposed form more letters have the
accents following.
Cool!
On WinXP SP2 under FireFox, the decomposed form shows some problems in
positioning the accent over the letter, but the accent is displayed. The
composed looks great.
On WinXP SP2 under IE, the decomposed form shows lots of accent
rendering problems, but each letter is there. In the compose
Jonathon Blake wrote:
Chris wrote:
Bibles all have (roughly) the same 66 books (give or take a testament).
The standard protestant canon is 66 books in length.
The Ethiopiac Canon is 81 books in Length,
The Syriac Canon is 5 books in length.
Hence "roughly" and "give or take a testament" (see qu
Chris wrote:
> Bibles all have (roughly) the same 66 books (give or take a testament).
The standard protestant canon is 66 books in length.
The Ethiopiac Canon is 81 books in Length,
The Syriac Canon is 5 books in length.
> So knowing or not knowing the language of the text is irrelevant.
When
There are various contexts in which it makes sense to display individual
verses. E.g. Quotations. Also, in the context of search, individual
verses are returned. Adjacent verses may be merged into a passage. These
are then presented to the user. Different clients do it differently. For
these to
Verification scheme is not easy to switch
as you think. I have tried to do that and finally I have to develop a
completely new verification scheme according to the Nova Vulgata numbering
system to include the Deuterocanical Books into my Bible program using the
SWORD code.
Hey guys,
I've spent some time cleaning up a module submitted by David
(dnr at crosswire dot org) which uses the base Westcott-Hort Accented
GNT from CCEL and merges in the morphology tags from Maurice Robinson's
WHNU text (our WHNU module). The result is an OSIS module that is fully
U
Chris Little wrote, among other things:
> In any case, it really has nothing to do with language.
> Remember, we're trying NOT to change or re-order the text like
> you were. So knowing or not knowing the language of the text
> is irrelevant.
But knowing or not knowing the language *is* relevant
DM,
No, SWORD currently does no work to promise any retrievable segment of
text as valid markup. I have talked with a few XML experts and have had
a number of ideas brewing for the past few years how we might offer such
information, as it is a necessary obstacle to overcome.
The quest
I asked this earlier on another thread, but it was lost in the noise of
that thread.
Does Sword, in making a module, ensure (or try to ensure) that each
verse is well formed? That is, for every begin feature marker, there is
a corresponding end feature marker. In XML and ThML it would be a
...
Dear C.N.R,
Why html? - Try Zefania XML!!
But our credo ALSO is, the versification has to stay as found in the
source and how it a native reader would expect. ;-) .
A smart bible software should handle all tasks which are nessecary for
comperative reading. O:-)
If you have trouble to publish yo
It has been stated on this mailing list that v11n is a priority that
has been scheduled. It impacts more than just the Sword API, it also
affects all the clients of that API. This will be a significant design
change that will require the involvement of the various frontents in
order to have a s
DM Smith wrote:
I looked again at the OSIS website and could not find that verse with
milestones is the best practice. I think I was able to figure out why it
would be a necessary practice. It is mentioned that if any OSIS
container element is used in the milestone form then that element must
C. N. R. wrote:
I've sent an answer to Mr Little but, not unexpectedly, he didn't reply.
Well, he is strongly defending his own view of the purpose of the SWORD
Project, even if everyone else seems to have a different opinion.
I don't know which email you're referring to that you feel I failed to
My apologies, I misinterpreted your previous message in the same way
that Lynn did, since that's the more common angle from which the "GPL
and Win32 system libraries are not compatible" argument is made.
But my second paragraph ("This is a non-issue.") still stands.
For the sake of argument, let
I've sent an answer to Mr Little but, not unexpectedly, he didn't reply. Well, he is strongly defending his own view of the purpose of the SWORD Project, even if everyone else seems to have a different opinion.
I am impressed by the fact that Mr Little wants to rebuild the Romanian Orthodox Bible
16 matches
Mail list logo
