On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Pastor Ed B. wrote:
> 1) there are a LOT of extra packages from Knoppix in IchthuX that just don't
> really need to be there to meet our stated outreach goals. Looking at the
> overloaded KDE menu just makes me feel bloated.
>
> Can we *please* get rid of the development packag
Uh... this isn't OSIS--not by a long shot. The points you raise are
entirely correct.
It's my sincere hope that this is from an old version of the module or
something.
DM Smith wrote:
According to the conf for NASB, the words of Christ can be in red. But I
don't see it and I think I know why.
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:24:42 -0700
"Pastor Ed B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, everyone! Greetings in Jesus' mighty name!
>
> I've been talking with Dave (my partner in the iXthus Project
> development), and we have some thoughts about IchthuX, and what could be
> done to streamline the pro
C. N. R. wrote:
Dear SWORD users,
In spite of Chris Little opinions, the SWORD program was conceived *to
make possible the comparative reading* of several Bibles versions and
the standard is the King James Version.
I don't know where you got that idea, but it is entirely wrong. It's
really dif
What I mean is that I'm working on a module. It has absolutely no
bearing on the engine.
Barry Drake wrote:
Hi there .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the prospect of this being the full text - are we going to have
support for the deutero-canonical books?
No possibility. The OSIS s
Jeremy,
I don't know what you are trying to accomplish by switching to the X
license or similar. It says that anyone can take your code and, as long
as they don't remove/modify the license statement, they can use it as if
it were their own. Their only responsibility to you is to supply the
unmo
Hello, everyone! Greetings in Jesus' mighty name!
I've been talking with Dave (my partner in the iXthus Project development),
and we have some thoughts about IchthuX, and what could be done to streamline
the project.
1) there are a LOT of extra packages from Knoppix in IchthuX that just don't
According to the conf for NASB, the words of Christ can be in red. But I
don't see it and I think I know why. I am not sure whether this is a
problem with NASB or with 1.5.8. I think it is a module problem, but
perhaps 1.5.8 should be made to accommodate.
Take Matthew 5.5. It is encoded:
Discip
I am considering putting the Sword capabilities for BibleMemorizer in a
separate library file and loading it as a plugin. This way, I could also
have an alternative plugin to return the names of the books of the Bible,
numbers of chapters, etc. for those who don't want to use Sword. A plugin
Moreover, all the alternative versifications require some special particularities: for example, in the Byzantine Bible (the Orthodox Synodical Bible), a verse may start in the middle of a KJV's one, contain the next KJV's verse too and reach the middle of the third KJV's verse. (This may happen par
Dear Modules developers,
Does that mean that we have to await other SWORD engines and other compiling tools ? ...That also means that all the foreign modules, (like LXX, BHS etc.) should be rebuilt ?... Excuse me, but I don't understand the reason, since the texts are the same and only the versif
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
Chris' comment that there is no chance alt. versification schemes
will be supported in the engine was directed for THIS RELEASE: 1.5.8.
I figured that. I didn't realize you were ready to consider mapping
mechanisms at this time, along with, not for, the effort on 1.5.
> Alt. versification functionality includes a mapping mechanism to
sync
> Bibles of different versification schemas. This is one of the
hardest
> parts, as alt. versification basic functionality was originally part
of
> the engine, but removed for performance gains-- and Daniel Glassey
has
> submi
C. N. R. wrote:
Jerry wrote:
I have thought that it would be nice if a module could support
a native versification and alt verifications. This could support a menu
option in a front end to select which versification to use, with the
default being native. But, this is something
Guys,
I'm not sure everyone is correctly being understood.
Chris' comment that there is no chance alt. versification schemes will
be supported in the engine was directed for THIS RELEASE: 1.5.8.
We have a roadmap online if you'd like to know the priority and
sequence we plan to add fu
Welcome Wade,
Here are several links from twiki.
http://www.crosswire.org/ucgi-bin/twiki/view/Swordwin/GettingStarted
http://www.crosswire.org/ucgi-bin/twiki/view/Main/LivingSon
- Original Message -
From: "Wade Maxfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 10:07 AM
Su
Jerry wrote:
I have thought that it would be nice if a module could support a native versification and alt verifications. This could support a menu option in a front end to select which versification to use, with the default being native. But, this is something to deal with when the project is r
Here's an ASCII one :)
~~~
><()*> ><((*> ><()*>
><()*>><()*> ><()*>
><()*> <()*>
><()*> ><()*> ><()*>
><()*> ><()*> ><()*> ><()*>
~~~
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [
I signed up yesterday to the mailing list.
I am trying to download the code using SVN. That went ok. It put stuff
in a "src" subdirectory, which was already in a src subdirctory due to
your web page directions.
I tried to download biblecs, and I got a directory named "Trunk", not
bible
On Mar 31, 2005 8:53 AM, Don Parris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gee, wish I had caught this thread sooner. Preston Boyington is another
> project leader - I assume he's still working at it. I believe it's
> Apologetix. He's part of the Linux 4 Christians list. As I am revising
> "Penguin in th
C. N. R. wrote:
...How could the comparative / parallel reading be possible
-- or the use of commentaries --, if we do not adjust the versification
of foreign Bibles to make it compatible with that of the KJV ? ...
I have thought that it would be nice if a module could support a native
v
Hello Troy!
Thank You very much for the response. I'm really sorry for the confusion
I've coused by using not so well prepared test osis file - please excuse me,
I was really so sure that positive schema validation gives the 'blessing' of
OSIS conformance... apparently I was wrong. I'll readi
Dear SWORD users,
In spite of Chris Little opinions, the SWORD program was conceived to make possible the comparative reading of several Bibles versions and the standard is the King James Version. How could the comparative / parallel reading be possible -- or the use of commentaries --, if we do
Hi there .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the prospect of this being the full text - are we going to have
support for the deutero-canonical books?
No possibility. The OSIS source will have the full text though.
Chris - are you saying 'for now', or 'never'? I understand that there
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
It is important for us to progress this tool to support more types
of OSIS markup which are valid, but advancing this tool does not have
any bearing on the engine and it is my opinion that it shouldn't hold up
its release.
I'm basically in agreement here, with one re
25 matches
Mail list logo
