On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Barry Drake wrote:
> Hi there .
>
> On 1 Jul 2004 at 13:38, Chris Little wrote:
> > Also, I don't know the feelings of others with regard to third party
> > distribution of modules.
>
> For my two-penn'orth, I'd say go for it! Any means that makes modules
> - esp
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, David's Mailing List and Spam Receiver wrote:
> On Thursday 01 July 2004 04:38 pm, Chris Little wrote:
> > Also, I don't know the feelings of others with regard to third party
> > distribution of modules. In cases where they're just distributing one
> > module, especially, I t
Lynn,
I think you will be "Iffy" on all of them... Based on the site foe Bible
Explorer, it would appear that you are only purchasing the right to use the
Bible Text in conjunction with the software, in this case Bible Explorer.
Although Bible Explorer allows you to create libraries for the "commu
I don't know if it's fair to "digitize" printed Bibles into sword
modules for personal use. But I know what are copyright holders afraid
of:
In one post (one of polish christian forums) I can read "I have sword
module with PBT prepared by myself within 2 days - I can change it for
Bible Society ve
Hi Jerry et'al,
Thanks for the feedback ... sounds reasonable
I've got purchased hard-copy and/or paid-for digital versions of:
NIV (hard copy and also via Bible Explorer 2.0 @ $100 ... ouch)
LB (Living Bible via Bible Explorer 2.0)
NET (New English Translation via Bible Explorer 2.0)
NKJV hardco
Lynn,
"Fair Use" is a very broad term or phrase that is usually described within
the Licensing document. In some instances it is limited only by the fact
that it not be republished with the intent to sell. In other instances it is
that it cannot be converted from the "media-type" the material owne
At 09:23 AM 7/2/2004, Lynn Allan wrote:
let's say I somehow have access to the texts of
the NIV, NKJV, and/or ESV. This might be through the Internet, Bible
Explorer, e-Sword, etc.
To vague. If you are making a copy of a copyrighted text from a source you
don't own it is very unlikely it is fair
On Thursday 01 July 2004 04:38 pm, Chris Little wrote:
> I think it's a bit of a disservice to our users since
> they could not use InstallMgr for installation and updating as
> conveniently as it is at the moment with a single download site.
Perhaps, but at least it is service at some level. As t
I would appreciate feedback on what entails "Fair Use" by individuals of
proprietary Bible texts.
For purposes of discussion, let's say I somehow have access to the texts of
the NIV, NKJV, and/or ESV. This might be through the Internet, Bible
Explorer, e-Sword, etc.
Is it ethical / legal for me a
On Thursday 01 July 2004 04:38 pm, Chris Little wrote:
> Also, I don't know the feelings of others with regard to third party
> distribution of modules. In cases where they're just distributing one
> module, especially, I think it's a bit of a disservice to our users since
> they could not use Ins
Hi there .
On 1 Jul 2004 at 13:38, Chris Little wrote:
> Also, I don't know the feelings of others with regard to third party
> distribution of modules.
For my two-penn'orth, I'd say go for it! Any means that makes modules
- especially quality ones like NET - available to all has to
11 matches
Mail list logo
