Re: [sword-devel] free Windows compiler for SWORD

2003-07-16 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
John, I tried compiling myself again. I removed both the sword and icu-sword folders, checked them out of cvs, and did a search for Tnt*.h* Nothing existed. Then I went straight to: D:\usr\scribe\src\sword\apps\windoze\CBuilder6\BibleCS\swordprj.bpg and did a Project|Build All Projects Every

Re: [sword-devel] free Windows compiler for SWORD

2003-07-16 Thread Hugo van der Kooij
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Chris Little wrote: > Hugo van der Kooij wrote: > > > But to this day I have not been able to understand from the crosswire > > website how to go about and create a module if I wanted to. And I have > > been looking into some Dutch documents I might want to add. But to this

Re: [sword-devel] free Windows compiler for SWORD

2003-07-16 Thread David Trotz
John, I would steer away from WinCVS 1.3, it has some issues still and is in beta. I ran into several problems recently with it and went back to 1.2 WinCVS 1.2 is very stable and useable. Once a stable release of 1.3 is out, I am sure we will update the CVS instructions. David Trotz - Original

Re: [sword-devel] free Windows compiler for SWORD

2003-07-16 Thread John Baima
At 03:43 PM 7/16/2003 -0700, you wrote: John, Yeah, it seems the beta version of wincvs is a little different than the stable version. I thought, at one time, we had instructions for both online. Anyway, glad you got it checked out. It sounds like you are opening the sword.bpr

Re: [sword-devel] free Windows compiler for SWORD

2003-07-16 Thread Chris Little
Hugo van der Kooij wrote: I amrather familiar with HTML and SGML assume I can get my head around other descriptive languages. We recommend using OSIS 1.5. The webpage is http://www.bibletechnologies.net/, the schema is http://www.bibletechnologies.net/osisCore.1.5.xsd, and draft documentation

Re: [sword-devel] free Windows compiler for SWORD

2003-07-16 Thread Chris Little
His views are by no means representative of the majority here. But his views are representative of the people who have made 90% of the module import tools. If people don't like those views, they can make their own tools--then their opinions will matter. Until then: what we have is generally w

Re: [sword-devel] free Windows compiler for SWORD

2003-07-16 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
John, Yeah, it seems the beta version of wincvs is a little different than the stable version. I thought, at one time, we had instructions for both online. Anyway, glad you got it checked out. It sounds like you are opening the sword.bpr file and NOT the swordprj.bpg Maybe I'm wrong, but t

Re: [sword-devel] free Windows compiler for SWORD

2003-07-16 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Hey guys, Just a few comments. Chris is back at Berkeley for the summer, so, in theme, he's just being dissenting. His views are by no means representative of the majority here. He does make a good point in that it would be MUCH MORE WORK FOR HIM if we had a million people submitting

Re: [sword-devel] free Windows compiler for SWORD

2003-07-16 Thread Hugo van der Kooij
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Chris Little wrote: > Leon Brooks wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:06, Chris Little wrote: > > > >>And it nonetheless stands; Linux users who don't know how to compile > >>for themselves need to learn (or move back to Windows). > > > > > > Or, to read this another way, if

Re: [sword-devel] free Windows compiler for SWORD

2003-07-16 Thread John Baima
At 03:19 PM 7/12/2003 -0700, you wrote: Hello all you Windows would-be developers, we have really good news. So, we're seeking Windows developers; no excuses now! Here are the steps to freely compile our free software freely :) Follow the WinCVS instructions to checkout the source code: http://

Re: [sword-devel] Sword Vision -Re: free Windows compiler for SWORD

2003-07-16 Thread Chris Little
Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: In other words, the theological content of programmers is much more important than the theological content of pastors, teachers, theologians, or seminary professors. If you would rather spend your time studying the Bible and writing sermons and articles rather than le

Re: [sword-devel] free Windows compiler for SWORD

2003-07-16 Thread Chris Little
Leon Brooks wrote: On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:06, Chris Little wrote: And it nonetheless stands; Linux users who don't know how to compile for themselves need to learn (or move back to Windows). Or, to read this another way, if you're an _administrator_ instead of a user, compiling should be no p

linux binaries was Re: [sword-devel] free Windows compiler for SWORD

2003-07-16 Thread Daniel Glassey
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 8:40 pm, Chris Little wrote: > A version of xml2gbs compiled for Win32 is available at our standard > utils location: http://crosswire.org/ftpmirror/pub/sword/utils/win32/ > > osis2vs is still beta software may need updates for OSIS 1.5. So it > will be released when it is

[sword-devel] Sword Vision -Re: free Windows compiler for SWORD

2003-07-16 Thread Don A. Elbourne Jr.
- Original Message - From: "Chris Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:06 PM Subject: Re: [sword-devel] free Windows compiler for SWORD > Cost of entry into module making is intentionally high to avoid a huge > influx of bad modules from people