Re: [sword-devel] russian Bible

2003-06-18 Thread YTang0648
In a message dated 6/18/2003 10:39:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: oic, so when you said "I have more russian text", you mean you have more Russian text of "dictionary/lexicons, comments and others" which can be used with the RST? Yes. For my work I need searchable Bi

Re: [sword-devel] Verse parsing

2003-06-18 Thread Joachim Ansorg
Hi! > Hey Troy, > > > 1) are you sure you have the latest CVS. We fixed Rev yesterday in > > English. > > Yeah, works now. Thanks. > The "1. Mose" style stuff still does not parse. Could you look at that > please? It works on my side. Make sure you installed the new de.conf :) Joachim -- <>< R

Re: [sword-devel] Verse parsing

2003-06-18 Thread Martin Gruner
Hey Troy, > 1) are you sure you have the latest CVS. We fixed Rev yesterday in > English. Yeah, works now. Thanks. The "1. Mose" style stuff still does not parse. Could you look at that please? > One day we'll rewrite that code and comment all the nuances, Lord > willing, and make it easier to

Re: [sword-devel] OSIS 1.5

2003-06-18 Thread Chris Little
Jimmie Houchin wrote: Subject: re: [sword-devel] 1.5.6 todo Date: May 28, 2003 Troy A. Griffitts wrote: [snip] > After last week's meetings, this and many OSIS documents > are not valid against the coming OSIS 1.5 spec. :) [snip] Any information available on the OSIS 1.5 spec? I would like to wri

Re: [sword-devel] Verse parsing

2003-06-18 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Thanks for all the work Martin! a few things: 1) are you sure you have the latest CVS. We fixed Rev yesterday in English. 2) I doubt the format of a Bible Book name like: TEXT 1. TEXT will parse 3) I think we could make this parse, and possibly your TEXT ROMNUM book names, but it will take more

Re: [sword-devel] russian Bible

2003-06-18 Thread Vlad Savitsky
oic, so when you said "I have more russian text", you mean you have more Russian text of "dictionary/lexicons, comments and others" which can be used with the RST? Yes. For my work I need searchable Bible, possibility make notes and view/read dictionary. As I undertand sword can use mo

[sword-devel] Web Interface - Parallel Version Display,

2003-06-18 Thread Don A. Elbourne Jr.
Joachim, I promised I'd get back to you on the parallel display. Basically the idea is to leave out all presentational markup out of the table itself and allow the external CSS to take care of that. so there is no need for width, cellspacing, cellpadding and inline style. I think it would be a go

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.6 todo

2003-06-18 Thread Jimmie Houchin
My apologies accidently hit send. Attempted to cancel. Unsuccessful it seems. :) Ignore this message. It is incomplete. Jimmie Houchin Jimmie Houchin wrote: Subject: re: [sword-devel] 1.5.6 todo Date: May 28, 2003 Troy A. Griffitts wrote: [snip] After last week's meetings, this and many OSIS docu

[sword-devel] OSIS 1.5

2003-06-18 Thread Jimmie Houchin
Subject: re: [sword-devel] 1.5.6 todo Date: May 28, 2003 Troy A. Griffitts wrote: [snip] > After last week's meetings, this and many OSIS documents > are not valid against the coming OSIS 1.5 spec. :) [snip] Any information available on the OSIS 1.5 spec? I would like to write an OSIS parser in Sq

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.6 todo

2003-06-18 Thread Jimmie Houchin
Subject: re: [sword-devel] 1.5.6 todo Date: May 28, 2003 Troy A. Griffitts wrote: [snip] After last week's meetings, this and many OSIS documents > are not valid against the coming OSIS 1.5 spec. :) [snip] Any information available on the OSIS 1.5 spec? I would like to write an OSIS parser in Sque

Re: [sword-devel] Verse parsing

2003-06-18 Thread Martin Gruner
> thanks for the info. I think I got the point. =) However, German is not the > only locale that has this kind of formatting. Others are cs, et, fi, hu, > it, no, ru, uk. All of those would need to be updated, then. All right. cs, de, et, fi, hu, it, no are now updated to include book names witho

Re: [sword-devel] Verse parsing

2003-06-18 Thread Martin Gruner
> PSS. Martin, yes, any other locale that ONLY includes '1. BOOK' syntax > should also have '1 BOOK' syntax added-- if you'd like to help update > those. Alright. Willdo. Martin ___ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/m