Re: [sword-devel] KJV2003

2003-01-07 Thread Mike & Amy Swanson
Troy, I just wanted to encourage you and say that I commend your response to Larry. I thought you handled that note to him really well and in a very Christ-like manner, especially considering the tone of his email. I also think Larry should learn to proofread his own writing a little better,

Re: [sword-devel] Module Copyright Info

2003-01-07 Thread Christian Renz
After updating the conf files on the server you normally have to clear the mods.d cache of the server. This can be done by the "clear cache" link located on the developer pages. Thanks, that did the trick! BTW, it's late ;) Yes. *sigh* Greetings, Christian -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://

Re: [sword-devel] Module Copyright Info

2003-01-07 Thread Joachim Ansorg
Hi! After updating the conf files on the server you normally have to clear the mods.d cache of the server. This can be done by the "clear cache" link located on the developer pages. I just did it. Does it work now? BTW, it's late ;) Joachim > I thought it would be a good idea to complete the

[sword-devel] Copyright website

2003-01-07 Thread Christian Renz
Another thing -- I found that the copyright website is rather hard to find. How about adding a news item to both the crosswire and the sword websites explaining that we only offer modules that we have permission to distribute and that copyright information for all our modules can be found at ... .

[sword-devel] Module Copyright Info

2003-01-07 Thread Christian Renz
I thought it would be a good idea to complete the Copyright information for my CEDICT modules, in light of the current troubles. I added the information to the config files on crosswire.org, but it doesn't show up yet on the copyright website. Will the website be updated automagically from the conf

[sword-devel] KJV2003

2003-01-07 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Larry, I'm working to removing your KJV+strongs module today. I've given you a link to the KJV2003 project in the past, but am providing you with it again here: http://www.crosswire.org/sword/kjv2003 You can read about our process for developing this text, but in short, we have 14 skilled v

Re: [sword-devel] Sword, PHP, and PostNuke

2003-01-07 Thread joachim
Hi! There are SWIG (www.swig.org) bindings of Sword. PHP is also supported by Swig, so you can try this. The SWIG bindings are in the bindings/swig dir of the source code package. If you need help getting started let me know. Joachim Curtis Farnham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 07.01.2003, 16

[sword-devel] Sword, PHP, and PostNuke

2003-01-07 Thread Curtis Farnham
Hello all! I joined the Sword Project about a week ago because I want to write a module for the PostNuke CMS (http://www.postnuke.com) that uses Sword modules and provides Bible text searching and lookup capabilities. I wrote a PostNuke module already (http://pn.e-cdf.com) that works with Sword t

Re: [sword-devel] new list services

2003-01-07 Thread Jonathan E. Brickman
> Hey guys, > We've just successfully (I think) migrated sword-devel over from > [EMAIL PROTECTED] to mailman. You can now modify your list > settings yourself at the following url: > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > mailman generated unique passwords for your ne

[sword-devel] Windows Interface Error

2003-01-07 Thread Pham, Khoi
Tried to compile SWORD with Borland C++ Builder 6 and I got this error message [C++ Error] RxRichEd.hpp [227]: E2316 ‘TRect’ is not Windows’ member. Can anyone help?   Paul Khoi X Pham Stone & Webster 281-368-3012  

Re: [Fwd: [sword-devel] FACTS]

2003-01-07 Thread Christian Renz
is taken to ridiculous lows: for example, sheet music has the type-setting copyrighted! Which is perfectly understandable, since typesetting classical music can involve research to find out the most probable original form of the music. It probably could not be copyrighted if you just take an off

Re: [sword-devel] Question for Optimization / speed experts

2003-01-07 Thread Christian Renz
Hey David, I really don't think an extreme amount of optimization is required; just moving to an O(n) algorithm instead of the current O(m*n) should be sufficient imho. You're right -- if that is still too slow, the most efficient optimization would be to not calculate everything at once, as me

Re: [sword-devel] Question for Optimization / speed experts

2003-01-07 Thread David White
Joachim, Glad I could be of help. Glen's algorithm is potentially slightly faster than use of set_intersection. It is essentially a generalization of the set_intersection algorithm to work on n sequences. However I think using set_intersection will be just fine as far as speed goes. Also note th

Re: [sword-devel] Question for Optimization / speed experts

2003-01-07 Thread David White
- Personally, I would find a list of *all* keys more desirable (that > is, list any key that is found in any of the chosen lexicons). I > took a look at Bibleworks when visiting my brother (he is teaching > OT) and noticed it has a feature where instead of having a window > per dictionary,