RE: [sword-devel] Texts from WTBC?

2002-10-23 Thread Storm
I just read their translation of John 1 and it is one of the best modern translations I have read in a long time. The notes were also well done. I would love to see this added to Sword. By the way, I'm a full-time pastor in Oklahoma and have lurked on here for a long time. You guys are doing great

[sword-devel] Install manager feature suggestion- sword updater

2002-10-23 Thread Kyle McConnell
(resent with a subscribed address) Under the assumption that once people install the software, they probably won't check the sword webpage frequently, but will probably run the install manager now and then to see if they have the most current/newest modules listed: Have install manager check th

Re: [sword-devel] Texts from WTBC?

2002-10-23 Thread Joel Mawhorter
On October 21, 2002 12:56, Joachim Ansorg wrote: > Do we already have the texts from > http://www.wbtc.com/articles/downloads/default.htm in Sword? I don't believe we do at the moment. I would like to see us get permission to distribute these for free. If no one beats me to it, I intend in the ne

RE: [sword-devel] update on BugReports

2002-10-23 Thread Stephen Denne
> http://sword.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Swordapi/BugReports > We could change the bug tracker to forward all changes on bugs to > sword-devel instead of sword-support. Shall we do that? Yes. > No testers have given any opinion (that I have noticed) on what they > want to do with bugs.

Re: [sword-devel] Locale abbrev "gsw" for modules?

2002-10-23 Thread Joachim Ansorg
Thank you, this helped me. I looked on the downoad script and saw GSW, ant thought it's used as iso639-2 code, because it has not x-E- in front of it. But only the download script left out the x-E- part :) Joachim > On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Joachim Ansorg wrote: > > Chris, > > where is the locale

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.5 Strong's number bug

2002-10-23 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Steve, Noted and reproduced your bug. Thanks. I'll get right on it. There is special code that says, "Hey, when I'm doing a word lookup, see if it is surrounded by <> or (); if so, strip those off cuz we're probably a strongs number." Well, problem is, the RTF control returns the current w

Re: [sword-devel] ftp site running OK?

2002-10-23 Thread Joachim Ansorg
Get the utils from ftp://ftp.crosswire.org/pub/sword/utils/win32/ I hope this helps you! Joachim > >= Original Message From Joachim Ansorg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = > >A Luther 1545 module is already available, but without strongs. > > > >Is this enough for you? > > > >Joachim > > Danke, Jo

Re: [sword-devel] MozSword

2002-10-23 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Hey guys, Simple OO wrappers have been made for other things like CLX. In the bindings directory there is a flatapi.cpp file that export a "C" api useful for making bindings. in clx/sword.pas you will see how we've made OO classes that use these. We only export the base interface classes, n

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.5 Strong's number bug

2002-10-23 Thread Martin Gruner
Ah, I see. This does not occur in BibleTime. Therefore I guess it is some uncorrect parsing in BibleCS, or in the standard sword render filters (which BibleTime does not use). There is no need to remake the modules, only the filter(s)/parser(s) need some fixing, which should be trivial. Martin

[sword-devel] update on BugReports

2002-10-23 Thread Daniel Glassey
http://sword.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Swordapi/BugReports Sourceforge now give you the option of requiring that people have a login before submitting bugs. I've activated that on the sf sword bug trackers. Apart from the slowness of sf it doesn't look too bad now. That and the dislike

Re: [sword-devel] MozSword

2002-10-23 Thread Patrick Narkinsky
Thus spake "Don A. Elbourne Jr."> : > If anyone else is interested in this, please jump in. The big hurdle I see > is getting XUL to talk to Sword. I am guessing that XPCOM is the way to do > this, but I'm not sure. For what it's worth, I researched that question a bit and, yes, XPCOM is what is

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.5 Strong's number bug

2002-10-23 Thread Steve Tang
Go to KJV & turn on Strong's number. E.g. in Gen 1:1, when you right click on <07225> and choose 'Dictionary Lookup', your chosen Hebrew dictionary show 07225, right? Try do the same at the end of the verse: <0776>. Instead of showing 0776, <0776>. comes up. Go to verse 7 where there is '<07549>:'

[sword-devel] MozSword

2002-10-23 Thread Don A. Elbourne Jr.
As requested, I put together a small XUL application for demonstration purposes. You can download it at: http://elbourne.org/sword/mozsword.zip Open the index.htm file with Mozilla and then use the button to spawn the MozSword application. It is important for me to point out that the demo does not

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.5 Strong's number bug

2002-10-23 Thread Martin Gruner
Steve, could you tell us more detailed what exactly is happening? I don't really understand what you wanted to point out. Martin > Comma is fine now. But not period and semicolon. > > I made a Chinese module with Strong's numbers. And I don't know why. This > funny thing also happens before Chin

[sword-devel] 1.5.5 Strong's number bug

2002-10-23 Thread Steve Tang
Comma is fine now. But not period and semicolon. I made a Chinese module with Strong's numbers. And I don't know why. This funny thing also happens before Chinese marks like comma, period, semicolon, but not words, as if sword knows the difference between Chinese words and marks. My guess is that