I agree with Joel. ICU dependancy is the price we have to pay for clean
Unicode support. We also will need it for the locale handling (toupper).
Martin
Am Dienstag, 1. Oktober 2002 00:40 schrieb Joel Mawhorter:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm writting to get reactions to the idea of making sword dependent o
Hi Chris .
On 8 Sep 2002 at 16:39, Chris Little wrote:
> The most urgent need is for people to test the following three
> commentaries (available in the Beta area):
> MHC
> JFB
> RWP
They are really impressive! No problems seen so far. Thanks Chris.
God bless,
Barry
-- From Barry Drake
"Troy A. Griffitts" wrote:
> Maybe I didn't expound very well. I feel that Zondervan will offer
> their NIV text in OSIS format very soon. If you are worried about using
> your favourite copyrighted texts in SWORD, you should feel confident
> that they will be available as OSIS texts in the near
hi,
i've started to get back to some work on bibletime and am having
troubles building sword. below is the top of the output from make. it
seems to choke first on the multimapwdef.h. i've got a fresh cvs tree,
and am using gcc 3.2 on a gentoo system. any hints/ideas?
thanks!
Mark
sh-2.
Hi all,
I'm writting to get reactions to the idea of making sword dependent on ICU.
Currently we only have optional dependencies on ICU (at least for
transliteration but I'm not sure what else). I would like to suggest making
ICU required for sword. The reason I would like to see this happen i
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Lisa Stapp wrote:
> A friend of mine asked this question... I told him that I wouldn't recognize
> an original language parser if it bit beyond the nose.
>
> > Lisa-
> > I downloaded the thing hoping for an orginal language parser, but
> > everything's phonetic. Do you know
STEP was supposed to be the same thing, and it appears to have flopped. I
hope OSIS succeeds. As a format, it is better, but I am partial to XML. As
far as vision goes, I'm not sure what real world advantages it will have
over STEP, if any.
by grace alone,
Don A. Elbourne Jr.
http://elbourne.org
A friend of mine asked this question... I told him that I wouldn't recognize
an original language parser if it bit beyond the nose.
> Lisa-
> I downloaded the thing hoping for an orginal language parser, but
> everything's phonetic. Do you know if there's any actual
> Greek/Hebrew modules? (I t
Good idea, good approach for a library.
Martin
Am Montag, 30. September 2002 12:38 schrieb Daniel Glassey:
> Hi,
> Does anyone strongly object to me putting the sword stuff into a 'sword'
> namespace?
>
> This will make naming conflicts (remember gettext?) a lot harder - I'm
> hoping that any te
This is an awesome vision for OSIS, one format that you can buy anything in
directly from the copyright holder or from a reseller, and every bible
software out there reading it or importing from it
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Steve Tang wrote:
> One annoying thing for me: Every time I type one character in the dic/lex
> index box, the focus goes away and I have to left click in the box again.
I'm not sure about the other bug you report, but Troy fixed this one in
the final release.
--Chris
> Does anyone strongly object to me putting the sword stuff into a 'sword'
> namespace?
[skip]
> that ok?
Ok for me, only desirable to provide the compatibility mode (turned on by a
macro) with Sword in global namespace. (We can throw it away after several
releases.)
--
Victor Porton ([EMAI
Hi,
I've cleaned up a couple but there are still 9 bugs for the windows
version in sourceforge (and 1 for qpsword and 1 for the lib). Could some
people please test those 9 and verify if they are fixed in 1.5.4?
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?group_id=9516&atid=109516
If you test the
One annoying thing for me: Every time I type one character in the dic/lex
index box, the focus goes away and I have to left click in the box again.
I have a Dell Latitude laptop running win2k.
Another minor issue is in search window, if I change bible version I lose
custom range.
On Fri, 27 Sep
Hi,
Does anyone strongly object to me putting the sword stuff into a 'sword'
namespace?
This will make naming conflicts (remember gettext?) a lot harder - I'm
hoping that any terms used in install manager stuff will be globally unique
but you never know and better safe than sorry. It will mean
Hi there
On 30 Sep 2002 at 0:28, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Does this make more sense?
Thanks for that - yes, it does make sense. I just hadn't understood the
vision for osis being a kind of universal standard that would be this
widely used. Sure - if Zondervan et al go for it, it
Maybe I didn't expound very well. I feel that Zondervan will offer
their NIV text in OSIS format very soon. If you are worried about using
your favourite copyrighted texts in SWORD, you should feel confident
that they will be available as OSIS texts in the near future, and sword
will read OS
17 matches
Mail list logo
