Hi Glenn ...
On 6 Sep 2002 at 9:27, Glenn Reed wrote:
> The project web site is at http://truth2000.sourceforge.net
Yes - you are on the right list - and welcome. I did take a look at your
project, but the list is a bit busy now, and I hadn't time to respond off-
list. I like your talking
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>There are JSword, a project which duplicated C++ code in Java.
>
>I think, it would be much faster (for computer) to call C++ code (not sure
>whether Java is able to call C++ directly, but we have raw C API) from Java.
>Am I right?
>
Dispite all the hype I think
Greetings,
I didn't get **any** response from my last email. Either I may not be
subscribed but only think I am. Or maybe I am subscribed to the wrong list.
Is there a more general purpose sword mailing list for people to ask
miscellaneous questions?
Kind regards
Glenn Reed.
> Would the idea thought of add any functionality or would it be
> just yet another front-end to something that is already a front-end,
> thus slowing things down?
Yes, it is two level front-end. But it is not a significant slowing down as
Sword Server will be a specialized program and so
I am also a person who relies on Diatheke with a fast server,
but even when I go to another computer (i.e. at work) partially due to
network traffic, my computer is often still faster than some of the ones
that had been mentioned. If there is a move to make a browser
attachment, it SHOULD
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > _Diatheke is slow_ (especially because of using it with slow web servers).
> > Consider my future Sword Server (It will serve through TCP). (I have hope to
> > make the fist release inside two weeks...)
>
> I'm not sure where you're coming fr
At 03:21 AM 9/7/2002 +0800, Christian Renz wrote:
>... but of course this is not a way to get text for (even locked)
The locked modules scare me. I try to say away from them.
Jerry
>It is good that you are not advocating it. For those who may not know, this
>kind of process is something that we should probably always stay away from.
Yes, I second that. I only did it because I was curious and it was
easy :-) but of course this is not a way to get text for (even locked)
mod
It is good that you are not advocating it. For those who may not know, this
kind of process is something that we should probably always stay away from.
Because, in the US the DMCA law and in many other countries similar laws
now make it a crime to "circumvent an access control." It is even a
v
Hi Stephen .
On 7 Sep 2002 at 1:23, Stephen Denne wrote:
> Psalms from 2 on don't show up.
> Headings and formatting don't appear.
In the version I took from e-sword there were no headings or formatting.
I've now fixed the Psalms problem and uploaded a new version to
http://wingtk.sourcef
I know this is off-topic, but I thought many people on this list would be
interested in the interview with Larry Wall on Slashdot today
(http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/06/1343222&mode=thread&tid=145)
.
Of main interest to this list would be question #7 where Mr. Wall talks
Along those lines, many online ebook places use your credit card number
and expiration to decrypt the encrypted file. Of course, this assumes you
are unable to crack the decryption engine so that it outputs the raw
(unencrypted) text after you've entered the CC, allowing the unencrypted
version t
>conditions. I would be surprised if they didn't have some kind of 'no
>modification allowed' clause, or restricted copying or restricted
>printing.
Actually, sword isn't at much of a disadvantage here. Even the format
of some closed-source bible apps is well known, so that the text could
be extr
Good news ;)
Just a couple of things to add.
But first, this is not meant to be a troll, so if you want to reply to this in a
flameful way to
what I say for further down please just reply to me privately or wait until the
celebration
of the release of 1.5.4 is over ;)
The ABS are major parti
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Simple. MozSword will be a Mozilla sidebar tab that allows users to pick versions
>of
> > the Bible in the tab and to input search terms. The search will be processed by the
> > CGI version of Diatheke. These following versions of the english Bible
If you look at the conffile of the hebrewmodern module you'll see at the end:
TextSource=http://unbound.biola.edu/
or in particular
http://unbound.biola.edu/zips/index.cfm?lang=English
Though if you have checked there I can understand your confusion as there is nothing
there that I can see
tha
Shalom,
I have asked before if any one knows
from were the ModernHebrew translation of the NT came from, and
some people sent some links, but all
the links referred to the OT. So, from where the NT came from???
It wouldnt be right to publish it
without fixing the errors within.
> Simple. MozSword will be a Mozilla sidebar tab that allows users to pick versions of
> the Bible in the tab and to input search terms. The search will be processed by the
> CGI version of Diatheke. These following versions of the english Bible will be used:
_Diatheke is slow_ (especially becaus
But if you read the IBS mission statement you would certainly think they would
release the NIV for free but they have been very tight fisted with it.
Joel
On September 6, 2002 06:23, Stephen Denne wrote:
> Psalms from 2 on don't show up.
> Headings and formatting don't appear.
>
> I took a look
Psalms from 2 on don't show up.
Headings and formatting don't appear.
I took a look at ABS's mission on their website, and I'd be highly surprised
if they didn't endorse free distribution through The Sword Project.
Stephen.
The option "CreateList From Results" only copies the first 16 verses to the
clipboard.
Dan
Chinese saying: Heros see the same foresights. - Bravo :)
I don't think you need to worry about language as long as utf-8 is
followed. I believe Mozilla is compatible now, or if not totally, will be
in a little while.
Before I bumped into Sword, I was getting myself ready for such an idea,
excep
22 matches
Mail list logo
