[sword-devel] Idea: integrating with webbrowsers

2002-06-18 Thread porton
We now discuss how to make tools for easy converting of web sites to Sword modules. (About SwordWriter etc.) But may be the following would be better: add to the OS new URL handler (sword: or bible: in addition to http: ftp: etc.) and so just integrate sword with commonly used HTML/XML readers

Re: [sword-devel] Copyrights and cash

2002-06-18 Thread Jan Paul Schmidt
Am Die, 2002-06-18 um 22.10 schrieb Daniel Freedman: > Secondly, I was thinking that instead of making it free I was thinking of > disabling copy and paste features on locked modules. I think it might be a > good proposal of providing a free translation while restricting copying. > > Copyright

Re: [sword-devel] Copyrights and cash

2002-06-18 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Thanks for all the comments. A few of my own... We have module making docs available and DESIRE others to make modules We have command line utilities available and DESIRE others to make modules. Chris would really LOVE for others to make modules. Enough said about that. Legit issue: Although

Re: [sword-devel] Copyrights and cash

2002-06-18 Thread Daniel Blake
Good Preaching brother Elbourne. I agree whole heartedly with needing "SwordWriter". It would be easy to implement a category system that denoted home brewed modules and published works excepted by the general Christian population. Daniel Blake > I have given a lot of thought to this iss

Re: [sword-devel] Copyrights and cash

2002-06-18 Thread Don A. Elbourne Jr.
I have given a lot of thought to this issue as well. I agree, a bible software can only be as good as its modules. In the past, I have advocated a more open content creation environment. If content creation tools were in the hands of content creators and not just programmers, I believe we would se

Fw: [sword-devel] new beta 1.5.4betaG

2002-06-18 Thread Daniel Freedman
   - Original Message - From: Daniel Freedman To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:13 PM Subject: Fw: [sword-devel] new beta 1.5.4betaG   - Original Message - From: Daniel Freedman To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 8:31 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.4g NB NB NB !!!!

2002-06-18 Thread Daniel Freedman
Dictionary lookups do not work in the BDB module in the new release. I tried doing a dictionary lookup on a couple of words in KJV and they got the wrong numbers There is something wrong there DF _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com

Re: [sword-devel] Copyrights and cash

2002-06-18 Thread Daniel Freedman
I think the whole point of sword that its free btw, all the bibles that are currently under copyright are going to be made redundant in the next 5 years anyway, because a new critical edition of the Hebrew Scriptures is being made. Secondly, I was thinking that instead of making it free I was thi

Re: [sword-devel] Copyrights and cash

2002-06-18 Thread David Burry
I'm all for someone forming a separate for-profit company (or joining with an existing one) that sells copyrighted royalty-laden sword modules... of course the base of sword would still be for free and so would all the freely distributable modules, only the copyrighted modules that must have ro

[sword-devel] Copyrights and cash

2002-06-18 Thread Barry Drake
Hi there I've been thinking a lot about the big copyrights issue. The Sword Project has some exceptional software to offer now. The performance outshines any of the commercial programs and the potential is growing rapidly. The Sword library itself is awesome and completely platform ind

[sword-devel] X11 install mgr question?

2002-06-18 Thread nic
I was wondering if it was possible to compile it atm? there's some issues with the Make stuff in the apps/X11 dirs, with the InstallMgr doing: c++ -g -O2 -o installmgr main.o callbacks.o MainFrm.o -L../../../../lib -lVCL -lSM -lICE -L/sw/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk -lgdk -lgmodule -lglib

Re: [sword-devel] filter

2002-06-18 Thread Martin Gruner
> For what purpose would you want to do this? If you filter out the > references from TSK, isn't it entirely useless? Right, just for testing purposes. We want to support this kind of filter in BT, and we would want to test this. TSK was just a random module coming to my mind, and you're right