[sword-devel] Mac OS X update [non-native front-end stuff]

2002-05-22 Thread nic
thought I'd let ppl know of my struggles yesterday and this morning with OS X and the existing front-ends (NOT the currently-in-development native ones)... since I was sick (nothing bad, just kept me from work) and in bed, I grabbed my laptop and updated my fink packages to be up-to-date with

Re: [sword-devel] Lawyer Help: Redistribution

2002-05-22 Thread Chris Bitmead
It's possible to get some electronic credit card hookup to a bank. It could then in theory be completely automated. You put in your card # and receive a key. Every 6 months you mail a cheque to the appropriate parties. David Trotz wrote: >I think the big problem is... who is going to take the

Re: [sword-devel] Lawyer Help: Redistribution

2002-05-22 Thread Chris Bitmead
What is NAS? Is that NASB? Joshua Holman wrote: >A few months ago, I read a survey of Pastors that concluded that the KJV, >NIV, NKJV, NAS, and the NRSV were the most popular. To be a player, we >should have at least 3 of the five. The other locked English Versions should >fall by the wayside.

Re: [sword-devel] RPM package improvements

2002-05-22 Thread Daniel Glassey
fwiw for debian I have them in /usr/share/man/man3 Regards, Daniel On 22 May 2002 at 13:54, Stuart D. Gathman sent forth the message: > On Wed, 22 May 2002, Martin Gruner wrote: > > > > As was mentioned, they are only installed with the devel package. The > > > question was: when the devel pa

Re: [sword-devel] RPM package improvements

2002-05-22 Thread Daniel Glassey
the dev package is also useful for people who want to build an app like bibletime or gnomesword or their own using the 'stable' library in the rpm. Sounds like a good idea to me :) Daniel On 22 May 2002 at 19:28, Martin Gruner sent forth the message: > > As was mentioned, they are only insta

Re: [sword-devel] RPM package improvements

2002-05-22 Thread Stuart D. Gathman
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Martin Gruner wrote: > > As was mentioned, they are only installed with the devel package. The > > question was: when the devel package *is* installed, should the man pages > > go in the /usr/share/doc/sword-devel-1.5.3 directory, where they are out of > > the way but harder

Re: [sword-devel] RPM package improvements

2002-05-22 Thread Martin Gruner
> As was mentioned, they are only installed with the devel package. The > question was: when the devel package *is* installed, should the man pages > go in the /usr/share/doc/sword-devel-1.5.3 directory, where they are out of > the way but harder to consult, or in the /usr/share/man/man3 director

Re: [sword-devel] RPM package improvements

2002-05-22 Thread Stuart D. Gathman
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Martin Gruner wrote: > > My spec includes the man pages and html docs with the devel package in > > /usr/share/doc/sword-devel-1.5.3. Should the man pages be installed in > > /usr/share/man/man3? There a lot of them. > > No. They are only relevant for the development and w

RE: [sword-devel] Lawyer Help: Redistribution

2002-05-22 Thread Daniel Adams - infoChi
I second Tero's idea of having them for some sort of purchase. Even more so I feel that even if we are to limit ourselves to three to five of the locked modules for improvement/corrections, we should never "give up on a module" because no one would want it. I regularly write information articles o