Well. Java itself has been out there much longer than PHP, in a sense.
Although PHP was created quit some time ago (8 years I think) it didn't
really catch on until the last year or so...
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Luke Stahlm
> > 1: If anyone is familiar with the APACHE web server, I am
> installing
> > it on my computer to test out the .jsp pages... Are there any
> > particular plug-ins I need to add in order to view .jsp
> files locally
> > w/ APACHE installed?
You'll have to set up Jakarta (http://jakarta.a
Dave-
PHP has been on web servers longer than JSP has. Are you talking about your
personal knowledge of PHP in relation to other scripting languages?
-Luke
- Original Message -
From: "David Overcash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 3:25 PM
Sub
I can't recall why we decided on .JSPs...
I personally prefer PHP / HTML but PHP is fairly new so it is taking a while
to catch on...
You would have to ask Troy or Chris, or Jonathan
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Timothy R. Butl
Hi,
> 1: If anyone is familiar with the APACHE web server, I am installing it on
> my computer to test out the .jsp pages... Are there any particular
> plug-ins I need to add in order to view .jsp files locally w/ APACHE
> installed?
I was just curious, is there a reason you are using jsp's?
> The form letter
> for copyright
> issues is just great! Can we have a list of publishers whose contact
> addresses you don't currently have? I'm sure a lot of us visit good
> libraries from time to time, and if we have a list, we can
> take a look when
> we come across those version.
I
>Hi David .
>
>On 19 Oct 2001, at 0:18, David Overcash wrote:
>> 2: What needs to be changed from the current site (which can be
previewed
>> at http://www.sword.cx/sword/)
>
>Just to say it looks brilliant - and everything I've tried works OK. You
>seem to have sorted most of the problems t
Hi David .
On 19 Oct 2001, at 0:18, David Overcash wrote:
> 2: What needs to be changed from the current site (which can be previewed
> at http://www.sword.cx/sword/)
Just to say it looks brilliant - and everything I've tried works OK. You
seem to have sorted most of the problems the old
