I tried to google for an answer but couldn't find anything. What is the
correct way to do the following on Linux?
@_silgen_name("foo")
func foo(theInt: UInt)
-> (a: UInt, b: UInt, c: UInt)
var (d, e, f) = foo(aNum)
Where foo is:
typedef struct {
long a;
long b;
long c;
jgr...@apple.com wrote on 2016-03-22 12:05:06 PM:
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 5:57 AM, Bryan Chan via swift-dev
wrote:
>
> > I tried to google for an answer but couldn't find anything. What is
> > the correct way to do the following on Linux?
> >
> > @_silgen_na
jgr...@apple.com wrote on 2016-03-22 02:37:47 PM:
> The runtime functions are hacked in various unsavory ways to give
> them Swift-like calling conventions. Many of them also have
> important semantics that the compiler needs to be aware of, so if
> they aren't exported as standard library API in
Thanks for your responses so far. It took me a while to fully appreciate
what all this means.
I have read through John's mail thread on llvm-dev about adding the swiftcc
convention to LLVM/Clang. I don't think that discussion mentioned adding
Clang support for C++ functions returning aggregates in
