Re: [swift-dev] [swift-build-dev] Reverting c85cbe

+ swift-dev > On 17-Jan-2017, at 2:58 PM, Alex Blewitt via swift-build-dev > wrote: > > Can someone revert my change > https://github.com/apple/swift/commit/c85cbe5c785cd729b28e802bcfa69a549fa78df7 > > > (curr

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-build-dev] Reverting c85cbe

Have created https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/6852 if that's easier to merge. Alex > On 17 Jan 2017, at 09:42, Ankit Aggarwal wrote: > > + swift-dev > > >> On 17-Jan-2017, at 2:58 PM, Alex Blewitt via swift-build-dev >> mailto:swift-build-...@sw

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #613

I have reverted f7836ae0c86726723bb11c7cb7f7ab04a57294c9 using PR https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/6852 > On Jan 17, 2017, at 12:12 AM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04 [#613] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-increme

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #114

I have reverted f7836ae0c86726723bb11c7cb7f7ab04a57294c9 using PR https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/6852 > On Jan 17, 2017, at 3:22 AM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-package-linux-ubuntu-14_04 [#114] > > Build URL: > https:/

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 - Long Test (master) #599

I have reverted f7836ae0c86726723bb11c7cb7f7ab04a57294c9 using PR https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/6852 > On Jan 17, 2017, at 12:12 AM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04-long-test [#599] > > Build

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #1417

I think this one needs a clean workspace. I kicked off a run of clean-workspace-linux-4. https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_10/ > On Jan 17, 2017, at 7:22 AM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_10 [#1417] > > Build

[swift-dev] Support for per-project code styles in SourceKit

Hi, all: I've been planning the implementation of per-project code style support for Swift. Hopefully, if implemented correctly, this tweet would not be true anymore: https://twitter.com/CodaFi_/status/821142027077238784 As I understand it, right now we have two possible kind of clients for

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-build-dev] Build triggers for 14.04 as well as 16.04?

+swift-dev swift-dev is right place for this. swift-build-dev is for SwiftPM and llbuild related discussions. > On 17-Jan-2017, at 11:36 PM, Alex Blewitt via swift-build-dev > wrote: > > Recently I've had a change cause problems on Ubuntu 14.04 where the problem > wasn't visible on Ubuntu 16

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-build-dev] Build triggers for 14.04 as well as 16.04?

Hi Alex, Can you please file a bug on bugs.swift.org? Thanks, Mishal Shah > On Jan 17, 2017, at 10:32 AM, Ankit Aggarwal wrote: > > +swift-dev > > swift-dev is right place for this. swift-build-dev is for SwiftPM and llbuild > related discussions. > >> On 17-Jan-2017, at 11:36 PM, Alex Bl

Re: [swift-dev] Support for per-project code styles in SourceKit

+swift-build-dev, since this affects the recommended structure of Swift projects and thus Swift packages. Jordan > On Jan 17, 2017, at 09:25, Daniel Martín via swift-dev > wrote: > > Hi, all: > > I've been planning the implementation of per-project code style support for > Swift. Hopefully,

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #1428

Philippe notes that this is because swift #4788, which this depends on, needs to go in too: https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/638#issuecomment-273302035 -Joe > On Jan 17, 2017, at 1:12 P

[swift-dev] updating Clang/LLVM stable branches

As I mentioned yesterday, once the last swift-3.1 merge is done, we are planning to update the stable branches for Clang/LLVM to use the new swift-4.0 branches that are aligned with LLVM 4.0. I was expecting we would do that today, but we’re going to wait until tomorrow (Wednesday) morning inste

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-build-dev] Final merge from master to swift-3.1-branch

I just merged master into swift-3.1-branch for following projects. https://github.com/apple/swift https://github.com/apple/swift-lldb https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #272

This has been fixed by merging https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/4788 . Next build should be clean. > On Jan 17, 2017, at 2:39 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-package-linux-ubuntu-16_10 [#272] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swif

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #272

We might need to cherry-pick this fix in swift-3.1-branch, because I merged master into swift-3.1-branch today. Thanks, Mishal Shah > On Jan 17, 2017, at 2:41 PM, Doug Coleman wrote: > > This has been fixed by merging https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/4788 >

[swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.04 (swift 3.1) #221

New issue found!Title: Report [FAILURE] oss-swift-3.1-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_04 [#221] Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-3.1-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_04/221/ Project:oss-swift-3.1-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_04 Date of build:Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:37:

Re: [swift-dev] Support for per-project code styles in SourceKit

My tweet was inflammatory, so excuse me (I was actually mad at Travis and vented about this instead). However, I think deeper integration with SourceKit formatting and Xcode would be beneficial, though I don’t know how much useful discussion about this can take place on the lists given that it’

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 16.04 (swift 3.1) #148

Looks like this PR needs to go into 3.1 branch: https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/772/files Philippe, do you cherry picking it over? Slava > On Jan 17, 2017, at 5:20 PM, Joe Groff wrote: > > Sorry, I may have cc'ed you on the wrong build failure. This one: > > https://c