[swift-dev] compiler-rt...Wait wat?

2016-08-17 Thread Ryan Lovelett via swift-dev
I just noticed that if you do `utils/update-checkout --clone` it pulls down `compiler-rt`. I have been building Swift from source on Linux for awhile now. I've never once checked out compiler-rt. Which makes me wonder if that repository is even in use. Here is the question: what is the compiler-rt

Re: [swift-dev] compiler-rt...Wait wat?

2016-08-17 Thread Mark Lacey via swift-dev
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 5:48 AM, Ryan Lovelett via swift-dev > wrote: > > I just noticed that if you do `utils/update-checkout --clone` it pulls > down `compiler-rt`. I have been building Swift from source on Linux for > awhile now. I've never once checked out compiler-rt. Which makes me > wonder

[swift-dev] Russian version of "The Swift Programming Language"

2016-08-17 Thread Ivan Akulov via swift-dev
Hi, my name is Ivan Akulov! Today I finished translation of the “The Swift Programming Language” to the russian language. Whole translation is available here: http://swiftbook.ru/doc/about-swift I also made a github repo for you to send me issues: https://github.com/IvanAkulov/The-Swift-Progra

Re: [swift-dev] Russian version of "The Swift Programming Language"

2016-08-17 Thread gian enrico conti via swift-dev
interested in an ITALIAN tranlastion? > On 17 Aug 2016, at 16:27, Ivan Akulov via swift-dev > wrote: > > > Hi, my name is Ivan Akulov! > > Today I finished translation of the “The Swift Programming Language” to the > russian language. > Whole translation is available here: http://swiftbook

Re: [swift-dev] compiler-rt...Wait wat?

2016-08-17 Thread Bob Wilson via swift-dev
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 5:48 AM, Ryan Lovelett via swift-dev > wrote: > > I just noticed that if you do `utils/update-checkout --clone` it pulls > down `compiler-rt`. I have been building Swift from source on Linux for > awhile now. I've never once checked out compiler-rt. Which makes me > wonder

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 (swift 3.0) #106

2016-08-17 Thread Max Moiseev via swift-dev
Unfortunate but expected. Need this change in the SwiftPM in order to test the https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/4361. > On Aug 17, 2016, at 4:22 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-3.0-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-15_10 [#106] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/os

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 (swift 3.0) #106

2016-08-17 Thread Greg Parker via swift-dev
This is about to break all of the bots. When do you expect a fix? > On Aug 17, 2016, at 4:28 PM, Max Moiseev via swift-dev > wrote: > > Unfortunate but expected. Need this change in the SwiftPM in order to test > the https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/4361 >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 (swift 3.0) #106

2016-08-17 Thread Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev
I suspect it is just waiting on: https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/4361 to finish testing, which it looks like is close. - Daniel > On Aug 17, 2016, at 4:54 PM, Greg Parker via swift-dev > wrote: > > This is about to break all of the bots. When do you expect a fix? > >> On Aug 17, 2016,

Re: [swift-dev] swift-corelibs-foundation failing in object conversion when building on Darwin host

2016-08-17 Thread Luke Howard via swift-dev
Now we have AnyHashable, NSUniqueObject in the archiver can go. I’ll file a PR. — Luke > On 11 Aug 2016, at 4:29 AM, Tony Parker via swift-dev > wrote: > > We have fixes ready to go for this keyed archiver issue but the inability to > get past CI has slowed us down on putting it in. > > - To

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 (swift 3.0) #106

2016-08-17 Thread Greg Parker via swift-dev
#4361 failed its Linux smoke test and never started its OS X test. I'm reverting once I find the right thing to revert. If you want to fix it, work fast. > On Aug 17, 2016, at 4:57 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > > I suspect it is just waiting on: > https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/4361 >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 (swift 3.0) #106

2016-08-17 Thread Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev
IMHO you can go ahead and land the revert, it is trivial. It's unfortunate we don't have a good way to manage this yet -- my suggestion would be that when it is ready to land (again) and well tested just land both patches in mainline. I realize that is unfortunate, but it is more reliable than

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 (swift 3.0) #106

2016-08-17 Thread Greg Parker via swift-dev
Reverted in https://github.com/apple/swift-package-manager/pull/610 . Either sequential or parallel updates would be fine. What we can't do is leave the changeover half completed with the bots failing overnight. > On Aug 17, 2016, at 8:38 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > > IMHO you can go ahead and

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-corelibs-dev] [swift-build-dev] JIRA workflow: "Resolved" -> "Verify"?

2016-08-17 Thread Ted Kremenek via swift-dev
I agree with Jordan. I think we can have a Verify state (per Jordan’s suggestion), and then have a script go over old tickets in Verify for a while and move them to Close. > On Aug 15, 2016, at 10:15 AM, Jordan Rose via swift-corelibs-dev > wrote: > > It hasn’t been used so much so far, but o