Dmitri Gribenko wrote on 06/02/2016 06:19:33 PM:
>
> Could you check if there are multiple definitions of off_t or mode_t
> in different headers guarded by macros? Something like this,
> duplicated across several headers:
>
> #if !defined(_OFF_T_DEFINED)
> typedef __off_t off_t;
> #define _OFF_T_
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:23 AM, David P Grove wrote:
> Dmitri Gribenko wrote on 06/02/2016 06:19:33 PM:
>>
>> Could you check if there are multiple definitions of off_t or mode_t
>> in different headers guarded by macros? Something like this,
>> duplicated across several headers:
>>
>> #if !defi
This one isn't me. Daniel, any idea why this test could fail?
Jordan
> On Jun 3, 2016, at 10:09, no-re...@swift.org wrote:
>
> [FAILURE] oss-swift-3.0-preview-1-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04 [#532]
>
> Build URL:
> https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-3.0-preview-1-incremental-RA-linux-ub
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev <
swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The current build process for the overall Swift project (i.e., the
> compiler + associated projects like Foundation, XCTest, and SwiftPM) relies
> on each project having dependencies on the buil
> On Jun 3, 2016, at 1:14 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Daniel Dunbar via swift-dev
> mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The current build process for the overall Swift project (i.e., the compiler +
> associated projects like Foundation, XCTe
