This sounds very reasonable to me.
What do others think?
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 2:31 PM, Brian Gesiak wrote:
>
> Sorry to resurrect an old thread! :)
>
> I'd like to propose the following:
>
> - We keep apple/swift's utils/vim, which will continue to provide syntax
> highlighting for SIL and
Sorry to resurrect an old thread! :)
I'd like to propose the following:
- We keep apple/swift's utils/vim, which will continue to provide syntax
highlighting for SIL and .gyb (and maybe .swift) files -- in other words,
file types that are relevant primarily to contributors to the apple/swift
proj
Awesome thanks! I'd definitely be interested in helping maintain this
plugin. I can't speak for Kevin but I assume he would be as well.
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 20:21 Ted kremenek wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> This makes complete sense. I can see why cloning a small self-contained
> repository would be i
Hi Keith,
This makes complete sense. I can see why cloning a small self-contained
repository would be ideal for plugin managers.
I'll talk about this with the core team, but I think this seems like a
reasonable direction.
Incidentally, we would need one (or more) active maintainers for the vi
Right there are 2 facets to the file hierarchy. The one covered in [2] is
the
standard structure vim expects when loading plugins. The need to be in a
separate repo is for vim plugin managers.
The most popular plugin managers[0][1][2] work by either you cloning, or
specifying a repo containing a p
Incidentally, for a long time I've maintained my own vim Swift plugin at
https://github.com/kballard/vim-swift. It provides a bunch of features like
compiling and running the current file when you press ⌘R. It's not entirely
up-to-date yet (e.g. I haven't updated it to allow string literals insi
I love vim and would love to see static analyzer and SPM-aware vim support. +1
from me.
> On Dec 31, 2015, at 6:11 PM, Dmitri Gribenko via swift-dev
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Keith Smiley via swift-dev
> wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> When swift was open sourced a few of us no
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Keith Smiley via swift-dev
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> When swift was open sourced a few of us noticed that there was some existing
> vim highlighting support[0]. While it sounds like what's there now hasn't been
> kept up to date for a while[1], that brought up the que
Hey all,
When swift was open sourced a few of us noticed that there was some existing
vim highlighting support[0]. While it sounds like what's there now hasn't been
kept up to date for a while[1], that brought up the question if there could
ever be a dedicated repository for vim support under the
