I agree that "_ =" is nicer than "(void)".
> Do you find yourself writing a lot of functions that return non-void
results that you frequently want to ignore? Maybe there's some idiom we
could do a better job of recognizing.
It really depends on the developer. Some will add return values thinking
> On Oct 30, 2016, at 5:49 AM, Jody Schofield via swift-dev
> wrote:
> Sorry, I'm sure this has been discussed before, but what the heck???
>
> This feature is killing me. Now I have go add @discardableResult to every
> function that returns a non-Void or use the ugly syntax `_ =`?
>
> Until
Sorry, I'm sure this has been discussed before, but what the heck???
This feature is killing me. Now I have go add @discardableResult to every
function that returns a non-Void or use the ugly syntax `_ =`?
Until swift 3 I've really enjoyed the new language. Now I find it to be
getting too rigid f
