I’ll add an assert and get rid of the conditional then. Thank you Adrian and
Joe, for the great feedbacks!
- Daniel
> On Jun 9, 2016, at 10:09 AM, Adrian Prantl wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 9, 2016, at 10:05 AM, Joe Groff wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 9, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Adrian Prantl wrote:
>>>
>
> On Jun 9, 2016, at 10:05 AM, Joe Groff wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 9, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Adrian Prantl wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 9, 2016, at 9:55 AM, Joe Groff wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Jun 8, 2016, at 7:38 PM, Daniel Duan via swift-dev
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm resuming work on r
> On Jun 9, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Adrian Prantl wrote:
>
> On Jun 9, 2016, at 9:55 AM, Joe Groff wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jun 8, 2016, at 7:38 PM, Daniel Duan via swift-dev
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm resuming work on removing the SILGen for the inout shadow copy. Making
>>> this chang
On Jun 9, 2016, at 9:55 AM, Joe Groff wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 8, 2016, at 7:38 PM, Daniel Duan via swift-dev
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm resuming work on removing the SILGen for the inout shadow copy. Making
>> this change involes quite a bit of tests updates. I'd love some one to
>> re
> On Jun 8, 2016, at 7:38 PM, Daniel Duan via swift-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm resuming work on removing the SILGen for the inout shadow copy. Making
> this change involes quite a bit of tests updates. I'd love some one to review
> this commit in SILGenProlog.cpp before I dive back into
Hi all,
I'm resuming work on removing the SILGen for the inout shadow copy. Making
this change involes quite a bit of tests updates. I'd love some one to review
this commit in SILGenProlog.cpp before I dive back into the deep end:
https://github.com/dduan/swift/commit/e56d73c065bec7bdde7c0ffee42
