Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 1. OSS - Swift ASAN - OS X (master) #927

“No space left on device" > On Jan 11, 2018, at 6:36 AM, swift...@swift.org wrote: > > New issue found! > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-ASAN-RA-osx [#927] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-ASAN-RA-osx/927/ >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 1. OSS - Swift ASAN - OS X (master) #920

Should be fixed by https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/13844. > On Jan 9, 2018, at 7:55 PM, swift...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-ASAN-RA-osx [#920] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-ASAN-RA-osx/920/ >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #994

Already fixed > On Jan 5, 2018, at 11:31 PM, swift...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-package-linux-ubuntu-16_10 [#994] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-package-linux-ubuntu-16_10/994/ > > Proj

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #2199

Whoops, missing #include . I’m AFK and won’t be able to fix for an hour or more. Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 5, 2018, at 7:36 PM, swift...@swift.org wrote: > > New issue found! > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_10 [#2199] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/os

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 2. Swift Source Compatibility Suite (master) #1014

> On Jan 4, 2018, at 11:14 AM, Vedant Kumar wrote: > > To follow up on this thread, I reverted #13597 (the profiling refactor) > because I couldn't get a clean run of the source compat suite. > > It looks like there's an issue unrelated to #13597 causing a few failures: > https://ci.swift.or

Re: [swift-dev] Conditional conformance: Removing the opt-in flag

> On Jan 2, 2018, at 11:14 AM, Itai Ferber wrote: > > On 27 Dec 2017, at 12:41, Douglas Gregor via swift-dev wrote: > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 27, 2017, at 11:05 AM, Karl Wagner <mailto:razie...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> >&g

Re: [swift-dev] Conditional conformance: Removing the opt-in flag

gt;>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 19, 2017, at 3:59 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2017, at 2:26 PM, Ted Kremenek via swift

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #2099

This has been failing intermittently for a while. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 21, 2017, at 12:25 PM, swift...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_10 [#2099] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_10/2099/ > Pro

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 2. Swift Source Compatibility Suite (master) #958

These are UPASSes; I’ll get the source compatibility suite XFAIL removed shortly if someone doesn’t get there sooner. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 21, 2017, at 6:09 AM, swift...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] swift-master-source-compat-suite [#958] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/s

Re: [swift-dev] Conditional conformance: Removing the opt-in flag

Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 19, 2017, at 8:31 PM, Ted Kremenek wrote: > > > >> On Dec 19, 2017, at 3:59 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Dec 19, 2017, at 2:26 PM, Ted Kremenek via swift-dev >>> wrote: >>> >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.04 (swift 4.1) #546

> On Dec 19, 2017, at 4:00 PM, Michael Ilseman wrote: > > Doug, is this you? Looks like a lot of conditional conformance tests and you > were touching that. Those are “conditional compilation” tests. Alex, this looks like your -target changes. - Doug > > >> On Dec 19, 2017, at 3:

Re: [swift-dev] Conditional conformance: Removing the opt-in flag

> On Dec 19, 2017, at 2:26 PM, Ted Kremenek via swift-dev > wrote: > > > On Dec 18, 2017, 4:53 PM -0800, Douglas Gregor via swift-dev > , wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> A little while back, I added an error to the Swift 4.1 compiler that >> complains if

Re: [swift-dev] Conditional conformance: Removing the opt-in flag

Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 18, 2017, at 6:27 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote: > > > >> On Dec 18, 2017, at 4:52 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> A little while back, I added an error to the Swift 4.1 compiler th

[swift-dev] Conditional conformance: Removing the opt-in flag

Hi all, A little while back, I added an error to the Swift 4.1 compiler that complains if one tries to use conditional conformances, along with a flag “-enable-experimental-conditional-conformances” to enable the feature. We did this because we haven’t implemented the complete proposal yet; spe

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (swift 4.1) #438

This failed once and then came back with no relevant source changes... - Doug > On Dec 14, 2017, at 7:41 PM, swift...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-4.1-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_10 [#438] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-4.1-incremental-RA-linux-u

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 2. Swift Source Compatibility Suite (master) #916

I’m checking that theory with https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/13427 and will complete the revert if that PR runs clean. > On Dec 13, 2017, at 10:08 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-dev > wrote: > > Arnold, these backtraces imply that it’s your change. > > S

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 2. Swift Source Compatibility Suite (master) #916

Arnold, these backtraces imply that it’s your change. Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 13, 2017, at 9:54 PM, swift...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] swift-master-source-compat-suite [#916] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/swift-master-source-compat-suite/916/ > Project: swift-master

Re: [swift-dev] [SE-0143] Dynamic casting for conditional conformances

> On Dec 12, 2017, at 2:29 PM, Jordan Rose wrote: > > > >> On Dec 12, 2017, at 14:15, Douglas Gregor via swift-dev > <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Dec 10, 2017, at 4:47 PM, Brent Royal-Gordon >> <mai

Re: [swift-dev] [SE-0143] Dynamic casting for conditional conformances

> On Dec 10, 2017, at 4:47 PM, Brent Royal-Gordon > wrote: > >> On Dec 5, 2017, at 2:28 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-dev >> mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >> >> To perform that mapping from a mangled type in a conditional requirement to &

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 2. Swift Source Compatibility Suite (master) #880

Kitura and NetService are passing again Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 6, 2017, at 8:05 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] swift-master-source-compat-suite [#880] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/swift-master-source-compat-suite/880/ > Project: swift-master-source-compat-s

Re: [swift-dev] [SE-0143] Dynamic casting for conditional conformances

e added to some later version of Swift and that would be fine. - Doug > > On 6 Dec 2017, at 00:42, John McCall via swift-dev <mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote: > >>> On Dec 5, 2017, at 5:28 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-dev >>> mailto:swift-dev@swift

Re: [swift-dev] [SE-0143] Dynamic casting for conditional conformances

> On Dec 5, 2017, at 3:42 PM, John McCall wrote: > >> On Dec 5, 2017, at 5:28 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-dev >> mailto:swift-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The main missing piece for conditional conformances >> (https://github.com/

[swift-dev] [SE-0143] Dynamic casting for conditional conformances

Hi all, The main missing piece for conditional conformances (https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0143-conditional-conformances.md) is support for dynamic casting. Right now, dynamic casting that queries a conditional conformance will always fail. Here’s an example: p

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 2. Swift Source Compatibility Suite (master) #756

Fixed by https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/12991#issuecomment-345338739 Sorry! - Doug > On Nov 17, 2017, at 10:15 AM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] swift-master-source-compat-suite [#756] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/swift-master-source-compat-suite/

Re: [swift-dev] "Near-miss" warnings for protocol conformances

> On Nov 2, 2017, at 6:07 PM, Brent Royal-Gordon wrote: > >> On Oct 26, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> Unlabeled single-value initializers are probably going to cause a number of >> false positives, because we can’t figu

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.04 (master) #1370

> On Nov 7, 2017, at 2:48 PM, Pavel Yaskevich wrote: > > > >> On Nov 7, 2017, at 2:47 PM, Douglas Gregor > > wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Nov 7, 2017, at 2:45 PM, Pavel Yaskevich >> > wrote: >>> >>> I don’t think this is related to your cha

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.04 (master) #1370

> On Nov 7, 2017, at 2:45 PM, Pavel Yaskevich wrote: > > I don’t think this is related to your changes, Doug: > > env > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=//usr//lib/swift/:/home/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_04/buildbot_incremental/foundation-linux-x86_64/Foundation:/home

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 1. OSS - Swift ASAN - OS X (master) #526

Xi, this is failing in swift::syntax::SyntaxParsingContext::ContextInfo::createFromBack(swift::syntax::SyntaxKind, unsigned int) which might be related to your recent changes. - Doug > On Nov 2, 2017, at 1:45 AM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-

Re: [swift-dev] "Near-miss" warnings for protocol conformances

> On Nov 2, 2017, at 7:47 AM, Ted Kremenek wrote: > > > >> On Oct 31, 2017, at 11:09 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Oct 31, 2017, at 11:08 PM, Ted Kremenek wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Oct 2

Re: [swift-dev] "Near-miss" warnings for protocol conformances

> On Oct 31, 2017, at 11:08 PM, Ted Kremenek wrote: > > > >> On Oct 26, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> Unlabeled single-value initializers are probably going to cause a number of >> false positives, because we ca

Re: [swift-dev] "Near-miss" warnings for protocol conformances

> On Oct 29, 2017, at 10:02 AM, Tino Heth <2...@gmx.de> wrote: > > >> Thoughts? > It’s a real problem, but I think there are better ways to fight it… none the > less, it’s the best countermeasure that is implemented now, so: Is there any > impact on performance? No measurable impact on perfo

[swift-dev] "Near-miss" warnings for protocol conformances

I have a pull request up to introduce “near-miss” warnings for protocol conformances: https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/12645 A “near-miss” warning fires when there is a protocol conformance for which: 1) One of the requirements is satisfied by a “default” definition (e.g., one from

Re: [swift-dev] Looking for documentation/insight on .swiftdoc

> On Oct 24, 2017, at 3:05 PM, Robert Widmann wrote: > > Or libSyntax! If it doesn’t do comments yet… it certainly should! - Doug > > ~Robert Widmann > >> On Oct 24, 2017, at 4:06 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> &g

Re: [swift-dev] Looking for documentation/insight on .swiftdoc

> On Oct 23, 2017, at 11:27 AM, George King via swift-dev > wrote: > > Hello, I’m curious about the swiftdoc format. I’ve looked through the swift > codebase and have been unable to find either documentation about it or the > relevant source code. Could somebody point me in the right directi

Re: [swift-dev] I need t change my mail address

> On Oct 6, 2017, at 11:09 PM, gian enrico conti via swift-dev > wrote: > > hell, I need to move my emial address where I receive this mailing to icloud > account, > where to perform the task? You can change your e-mail address at https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev.

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #900

> On Oct 2, 2017, at 6:22 PM, Jordan Rose wrote: > > Doug, did you win back all the regressions yet? If not, we should probably > bump up the Linux timeout for now. It's waffling back and forth between > success and failure so 40 minutes ought to be enough for testing. > > (Yes, we want the

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #358

I reverted these commits a while ago. The bots are still catching up. - Doug > On Sep 25, 2017, at 3:43 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-package-linux-ubuntu-16_10 [#358] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-package-linux-ubuntu-16_10/358/ >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 - Long Test (master) #295

Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 23, 2017, at 12:20 AM, Andrew Trick wrote: > > Yeah, that error I saw was really just an @error. But I don’t see any bots > that have passed with long tests and don’t see any other commits that would > affect the stdlib serialized SIL. > > It should reproduce lo

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 - Long Test (master) #295

This could certainly be me, but it’s not reproducing anywhere else and ci.swift.org is down right now. These are all warnings, which are “fine”; the actual failure was just “Killed” for these tests, which makes me wonder if we timed out somehow. - Doug > On Sep 22, 2017, at 9:44 PM, Jo

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #507

Huh. This failure TestFoundation/TestThread.swift:110: error: TestThread.test_mainThread : XCTAssertTrue failed - NSCondition wait timed out Have we seen it before? It didn’t show up in any of the PR testing and seems unrelated to my changes. - Doug > On Sep 12, 2017, at 8:44

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-evolution] Preparing Swift compiler stage reentrancy in preparation for "constexpr"

> On Aug 19, 2017, at 12:27 PM, Daryle Walker via swift-evolution > wrote: > > [I’m not sure which list should cover this.] > > I once thought of having a “#protocols(SomeTypeOrProtocol)” that was a type > alias to a composition of all protocols the given type/protocol conforms to > (or “Any

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 16.04 (swift 4.0) #585

Ankit, any ideas? Test Case 'ProcessSetTests.testSigKillEscalation' failed (1843.628 seconds) > On Jul 25, 2017, at 2:45 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-4.0-package-linux-ubuntu-16_04 [#585] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-4.0-package-linux-

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.04 - Long Test (master) #1661

Argyrios, is this you? Index-while-building related. - Doug > On Jun 29, 2017, at 4:51 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_04-long-test [#1661] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_04-long

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 - Long Test (master) #1527

https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/10661 > On Jun 28, 2017, at 9:32 AM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_10-long-test [#1527] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #972

Yikes, this is me. It’s a long_test, so smoke testing didn’t catch it. I believe I have a fix, but if it doesn’t pan out *fast*, I’ll revert. - Doug > On Jun 28, 2017, at 9:15 AM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-package-linux-ubuntu-14_04 [#972] > > Build URL: > h

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: OSS - Swift Package - OS X (swift 4.0) #150

I didn’t fill up the disk :) -- scp toolchain tar -- /tmp/swift-4.0-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2017-05-20-a-152-WORKSPACE/swift-4.0-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2017-05-20-a-osx-symbols.tar.gz: No space left on device Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure > On May 20, 2017, at 5:35 AM, no-reply--

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #3083

It’s filing trying to open a file for output for the binary. Huon, these tests should probably have explicit “-o” options to put the output files somewhere into %t ? - Doug > On Apr 18, 2017, at 10:14 AM, Erik Eckstein wrote: > > Doug, > > only your changes are on the blame list. Can

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 1. OSS - Swift ASAN - OS X (master) #123

Xi, this is in the area you’ve been working on recently. - Doug > On Mar 7, 2017, at 3:11 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > New issue found! > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-ASAN-RA-osx [#123] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-ASAN-RA-osx/123/ >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #8539

Very suspicious: OSError: [Errno 35] Resource temporarily unavailable > On Feb 23, 2017, at 3:08 PM, Jordan Rose wrote: > > Doug? > >> On Feb 23, 2017, at 15:05, no-re...@swift.org >> wrote: >> >> [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx [#8539] >> >> Build URL:

Re: [swift-dev] Summary of outstanding compiler crashers

> On Feb 9, 2017, at 10:57 PM, Jacob Bandes-Storch via swift-dev > wrote: > > This may or may not be practically useful to anyone, but I've collected a > summary of the currently outstanding compiler crashers, somewhat categorized: > > https://gist.github.com/jtbandes/95ebf031d0ae4890d4dc3dc7

Re: [swift-dev] ArchetypeBuilder rename

gt; >> On Feb 7, 2017, at 4:59 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> The ArchetypeBuilder class, whose primary responsibility is to validate, >> minimize, and canonicalize generic signatures, now has almost nothing to do

[swift-dev] ArchetypeBuilder rename

Hi all, The ArchetypeBuilder class, whose primary responsibility is to validate, minimize, and canonicalize generic signatures, now has almost nothing to do with archetypes. I’d like to rename it to GenericSignat

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #1699

> On Feb 3, 2017, at 11:12 AM, Michael Ilseman wrote: > > Is that a missing dependency in CMake then? They’re totally separate projects (swift vs. swift-corelibs-foundation), so it’s an issue with cross-project dependencies. - Doug > >> On Feb 3, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Douglas Gregor >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #1704

Ugh, standard library isn’t getting rebuilt. Clearing the workspace… - Doug > On Feb 3, 2017, at 10:57 AM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_10 [#1704] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_1

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #1699

> On Feb 3, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Ankit Aggarwal wrote: > > >> On 03-Feb-2017, at 11:55 PM, Douglas Gregor > > wrote: >> >> >>> On Feb 3, 2017, at 10:24 AM, Michael Ilseman >> > wrote: >>> >>> Doug G, is this this same issue you’re working on

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #1699

> On Feb 3, 2017, at 10:24 AM, Michael Ilseman wrote: > > Doug G, is this this same issue you’re working on, or a different one? Oooh, could be different! Ankit, is this only on Linux? - Doug > > >> On Feb 3, 2017, at 5:52 AM, Ankit Aggarwal > > wrot

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #1693

/home/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_10/buildbot_incremental/foundation-linux-x86_64/TestFoundation/TestFoundation: symbol lookup error: /home/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_10/buildbot_incremental/foundation-linux-x86_64

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #8155

> On Jan 30, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Slava Pestov wrote: > > I saw one of these before Joe’s change went in. It might be more > non-determinism with archetypes… I’m working on the general problem here. - Doug > >> On Jan 30, 2017, at 3:11 PM, Michael Ilseman via swift-dev >> mailto:swift

Re: [swift-dev] A more principled rule for filtering and scoring potential witnesses for associated type inference

> On Jan 30, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Joe Groff wrote: > > In https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/7136 I tried to address some issues > with associated type inference's consideration of witnesses. A property of > associated type inference that sets it apart from other name lookup and > overload res

Re: [swift-dev] Anonymous closure arguments vs varargs

Hi Slava, > On Jan 4, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Slava Pestov via swift-dev > wrote: > > Hi all, > > In Swift 3.0, the following examples both typecheck: > > let fn1: ([Int]) -> () = { > let _: [Int] = $0 > } > > let fn2: (Int...) -> () = { > let _: [Int] = $0 > } > > This stopped working due to a

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #7480

this test is behaving nondeterministically. Can somewhat slap a “REQUIRES: deterministic-behavior” on it? - Doug > On Dec 7, 2016, at 4:48 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx [#7480] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-R

Re: [swift-dev] [RFC] Modify the build system to enable/disable ObjC interop for any platform

> On Nov 28, 2016, at 7:26 AM, Brian Gesiak via swift-dev > wrote: > > Hello all! > > While reviewing https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/5904 > , I had a crazy thought, and I'd > like to get some feedback on it. > > Here's my original comment >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #7279

ecided to mess up my > build czar record. > > Kuba, it looks like things got even worse with your latest fix. > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/7280/ > > Jordan > > >> On Nov 18, 2016, at 16:13, Douglas Gregor via swift-dev >> wr

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #7279

Eh? ncremental-RA-osx/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_mac.cc clang-3.8: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-stdlib=libc++' [-Wunused-command-line-argument] clang-3.8: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-mmacosx-version-min=10.9' [-Wunused-command-li

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #436

It's an undefined symbol in Corelibs foundation. I've only seen this happen when Foundation didn't get properly rebuilt with the latest Swift. Should I hold off on clearing the workspace? Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 8, 2016, at 7:19 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-increm

Re: [swift-dev] Associated type inference fun with RandomAccessCollection

> On Nov 8, 2016, at 1:58 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-dev > wrote: > > > on Mon Nov 07 2016, Douglas Gregor > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> While working on the type checker, I came across an interesting case for >> associated type inference >> with the ‘Indices

[swift-dev] Recursive protocol constraints

Hi all, Just a heads-up that I’ve been working on the implementation of recursive protocol constraints in master. For reference, this will eventually lead to allowing, e.g., protocol

Re: [swift-dev] Associated type inference fun with RandomAccessCollection

Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 7, 2016, at 7:07 PM, Mark Lacey wrote: > > >> On Nov 7, 2016, at 6:16 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> While working on the type checker, I came across an interesting case for >>

[swift-dev] Associated type inference fun with RandomAccessCollection

Hi all, While working on the type checker, I came across an interesting case for associated type inference with the ‘Indices’ type of RandomAccessCollection. At issue is a simple model of RandomAccessCollection where the Index type is Int: class ReferenceCollection : RandomAccessCollection {

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #7075

*sigh* Sorry, all. Fixed for real this time. > On Nov 6, 2016, at 11:00 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > New issue found! > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx [#7075] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/7075/ >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.04 (master) #517

already fixed > On Nov 6, 2016, at 10:39 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_04 [#517] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_04/517/ >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #395

Ugh, I’m on it. - Doug > On Nov 6, 2016, at 10:10 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_10 [#395] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_10/395/ >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.04 (master) #161

Drat. I need to move a file in the test case. I'll get to it once I am able to get to a keyboard. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 3, 2016, at 3:22 AM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_04 [#161] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swif

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #7678

estFoundation/TestNSURLSession.swift:40: error: TestURLSession.test_dataTaskWithURL : Asynchronous wait failed - Exceeded timeout of 12.0 seconds, with unfulfilled expectations: data task TestFoundation/TestNSURLSession.swift:42: error: Te > On Sep 27, 2016, at 9:37 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 - Long Test (master) #976

Crap, this is me; libstdc++ doesn’t have a non-explicit tuple constructor. - Doug > On Sep 27, 2016, at 8:44 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-15_10-long-test [#976] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-li

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #7431

Bad file descriptor in SwiftPM: Test Case 'ShellTests.testPopen' started at 06:33:36.572 fatal error: 'try!' expression unexpectedly raised an error: POSIX.ShellError.popen(["echo", "foo"], read error: Bad file descriptor (9)): file /home/buildnode/disk2/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux

Re: [swift-dev] SIL to IR lowering

> On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Rebecca Chen via swift-dev > wrote: > > I was wondering where the SIL to IR lowering code is in the Swift source > code. That’s the responsibility of IRGen: https://github.com/apple/swift/tree/master/lib/IRGen > I am specifically looking for the code t

Re: [swift-dev] Xcode 8 GM: Compiler segfaults on ExpressibleByArrayLiteral

> On Sep 8, 2016, at 6:50 AM, Ole Begemann via swift-dev > wrote: > > I'm seeing a segmentation fault when compiling this code with Xcode 8 GM: > > ``` > // stack.swift > struct Stack { >var elements: [Element] = [] > } > > extension Stack: ExpressibleByArrayLiteral { >init(arrayLiter

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 - Long Test (master) #827

Foundation/NSData.swift:19:8: error: module file was created by an older version of the compiler; rebuild 'Dispatch' and try again: /home/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-15_10-long-test/buildbot_incremental/libdispatch-linux-x86_64/src/swift/Dispatch.swiftmodule

Re: [swift-dev] __swift__

> On Aug 25, 2016, at 2:48 PM, Jordan Rose wrote: > >> >> On Aug 25, 2016, at 9:38, Douglas Gregor > > wrote: >> >>> >>> On Aug 24, 2016, at 3:57 PM, Jordan Rose >> > wrote: >>> >>> Hey, all. I’m here to propose predefining a macro __sw

Re: [swift-dev] __swift__

> On Aug 24, 2016, at 3:57 PM, Jordan Rose wrote: > > Hey, all. I’m here to propose predefining a macro __swift__ when C code is > compiled with Swift. We’ve gotten a few requests for it in the past and > haven’t done it so that people don’t write header files that arbitrarily > restrict feat

Re: [swift-dev] SE-0111 related question

> On Aug 18, 2016, at 9:52 AM, Benjamin G via swift-dev > wrote: > > Sorry for mentioning this issue again, as it seems to have been already much > discussed, but i've had the unfortunate experience of dealing with the > consequences of this proposal in my code since xcode beta 6, which i rea

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #6852

More typos in scripts? /tmp/hudson4436785400358516077.sh: line 8: /home/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04/swift/utils/build-script: No such file or directory > On Aug 5, 2016, at 4:38 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-lin

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 - Long Test (master) #654

Not sure what this is… results/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lit-tests.xml' relative to '/home/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04-long-test' for the testing framework 'JUnit'. Did you enter a pattern relative to the correct directory? Did you generate the resu

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-evolution] [Swift 4] Organizing source stability

> On Aug 3, 2016, at 1:16 AM, Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-dev > wrote: > >> On Jul 29, 2016, at 5:55 PM, Jacob Bandes-Storch via swift-evolution >> wrote: >> >> • a top-of-file "shebang"-style comment indicating the version, >> something like //#swift(4), mirroring the "#if swift" syn

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5575

_nsErrorDomain is synthesized by the Clang importer. I wonder if that’s not happening reliably. - Doug > On Jul 29, 2016, at 9:33 AM, Jordan Rose wrote: > > [+Doug] I’ve seen this come up a few times too. Clearing the module cache > sometimes makes it go away, which seems really suspi

Re: [swift-dev] Implementing SE-0111: Remove type system significance of function argument labels

016, at 9:58 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-dev > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I’ve been working on implementing SE-0111: Remove type system significance of > function argument labels > <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0111-remove-arg-label-t

[swift-dev] Implementing SE-0111: Remove type system significance of function argument labels

Hi all, I’ve been working on implementing SE-0111: Remove type system significance of function argument labels . Actually implementing this feature completely requires major surgery to the

Re: [swift-dev] End of source-breaking changes for Swift 3

> On Jul 27, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Jordan Rose via swift-dev > wrote: > > Associating some proposals with their current implementers for the record… > >> On Jul 27, 2016, at 12:38, Ted Kremenek via swift-dev > > wrote: >> >> Dear friends, >> >> Today is July 27 — and

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #6389

Something is fishy here… looks like Foundation is getting a stale standard library somehow. I’ve cleared the workspace. - Doug > On Jul 21, 2016, at 3:32 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04 [#6389] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swif

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 - Long Test (master) #535

Looks like a missing #include . - Doug > On Jul 15, 2016, at 4:41 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-15_10-long-test [#535] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-15_10-long-test/535/ > >

Re: [swift-dev] Descriptive Protocol non-conformance errors

> On Jun 25, 2016, at 1:19 PM, Sean Alling via swift-dev > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I’m suggesting a change to the compiler that returns an error when an object > 'does not conform to protocol’ to nest sub-errors that’ll list what > properties and methods the object hasn’t implemented. >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #1442

Looks like a great that should require the Objjective-C runtime. Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 2, 2016, at 7:01 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-package-linux-ubuntu-14_04 [#1442] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-package-linux-ubuntu-14_04/1442/ > Pro

Re: [swift-dev] Delaying the enforcement of ".self" out of Swift 3?

> On Jun 2, 2016, at 1:38 PM, David Sweeris wrote: > >> On Jun 2, 2016, at 3:24 PM, Erica Sadun via swift-dev > > wrote: >> >> 3. If it can be fixed, fix it. (It is a bug.) And THEN change the language >> using the normal SE evolution process. > > I thought “Deferr

[swift-dev] Delaying the enforcement of ".self" out of Swift 3?

Hi all, While working on some unrelated refactoring, I stumbled across a minor fix that would make use properly enforce “.self” when we want to get the metatype of a named type. For example, the Swift compiler currently (incorrectly) allows sizeof(UInt) which should be sizeof(

Re: [swift-dev] Swift AST documentation

> On May 24, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Tim Bodeit wrote: > > I would be interested in documentation of the AST syntax as well. > > Are there any documents about this so far? No, not really; just the sources via doc comments, e.g., include/swift/AST/Decl.h. > If not, are there any plans for such docu

Re: [swift-dev] Automator service: "View Public Swift Commit"

> On May 18, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Jordan Rose via swift-dev > wrote: > > Hi, fellow Mac users. On GitHub, commit hashes are autolinked (within > repositories, anyway), but that doesn't apply to mail clients, or, um, > external bug tracking clients *cough*Radar*cough*. I've found myself wanting

Re: [swift-dev] ObjC generic containers and ObjectiveCBridgeable conformance

> On Apr 27, 2016, at 10:23 AM, Joe Groff wrote: > > Importing ObjC generics is currently disabled for the bridged container > classes, NSArray, NSDictionary, and NSSet. To enable generics for these > types, we need to figure out what to do about their interaction with > ObjectiveCBridgeable

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #3669

Fix incoming.,.. > On Apr 26, 2016, at 5:28 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx [#3669] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/3669/ > > Project: oss-swift-in

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 (master) #4500

Obj-C only test; fixed now. - Doug > On Apr 25, 2016, at 4:18 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-15_10 [#4500] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-15_10/4500/ >

  1   2   >