Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 1. OSS - Swift ASAN - OS X (master) #920

2018-01-09 Thread Douglas Gregor via swift-dev
Should be fixed by https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/13844. > On Jan 9, 2018, at 7:55 PM, swift...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-ASAN-RA-osx [#920] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-ASAN-RA-osx/920/ >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #2364

2018-01-09 Thread Ben Langmuir via swift-dev
This is the second time I recall seeing this recently. The following tests FAILED: 5 - dispatch_group (Timeout) > On Jan 9, 2018, at 12:08 PM, swift...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04 [#2364] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/o

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.04 (swift 4.1) #653

2018-01-09 Thread Ben Langmuir via swift-dev
+ Tony, Philippe Do either of you recognize this issue? > On Jan 9, 2018, at 11:27 AM, Ben Langmuir via swift-dev > wrote: > > I don't see an obvious connection between these changes and the timeout. > > Test Case 'TestNSLock.test_threadsAndLocks' started at 2018-01-09 18:34:55.372 > <>Build

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.04 (swift 4.1) #653

2018-01-09 Thread Ben Langmuir via swift-dev
I don't see an obvious connection between these changes and the timeout. Test Case 'TestNSLock.test_threadsAndLocks' started at 2018-01-09 18:34:55.372 <>Build timed out (after 45 minutes). Marking the build as failed. > On Jan 9, 2018, at 11:20 AM, swift...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-s

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-corelibs-dev] Discourse rollout re-schedule

2018-01-09 Thread Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf via swift-dev
Hi Nicole, > Am 15.12.2017 um 03:59 schrieb Nicole Jacque via swift-corelibs-dev > : > > Hi All- > > First of all, a big thank you to everyone who has provided feedback on our > prototype Discourse forum. Based on the fact that we’re still receiving > feedback, we’d like to move to a slightl