[swift-dev] build-script has newfound interest in ninja source?

So after updating my sources, build-script fails to work with the following error: ./utils/build-script: fatal error: can't find source directory for ninja (tried /Volumes/data/wt/swift/master/ninja) Why does it care about where my ninja source is? Why does "--build-ninja false" not work? Tha

[swift-dev] Patch RFC: value-type bound protocols

I’d still like some feedback from the core team about whether value-type bound protocols are worth formally proposing (and if so, what is the process like these days). Thanks! Dave https://github.com/davezarzycki/swift/commit/32f32ce009f649772df57c94e2958bed4ef142ab Or inline: diff --git a/i

[swift-dev] Notes on the coroutines ABI

Even if we don't do coroutines as a user feature in Swift 5, we want to make sure we implement coroutine-esque features (like materializeForSet) with an ABI that we're satisfied with. Joe Groff and I were talking about the low-level structure of that ABI, and I wanted to make sure that it was a

Re: [swift-dev] Value-type bound protocols?

> On Sep 13, 2017, at 15:23, Matthew Johnson via swift-dev > wrote: > > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 11:56 AM, David Zarzycki via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 13:53, David Sweeris wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 09:54, David Zarzyc

Re: [swift-dev] Unit tests for the Swift project

> On Sep 12, 2017, at 11:29 PM, Alwyn Concessao wrote: > > Okay.I see a couple of Swift files and .gyb files inside test/stdlib.I've > made changes to the RangeReplaceableCollection protocol of the Swift > stdlib.How can I write unit tests for that?Can I generate an Xcode project > for the un

Re: [swift-dev] Value-type bound protocols?

> On Sep 13, 2017, at 12:23 PM, Matthew Johnson via swift-dev > wrote: > > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 11:56 AM, David Zarzycki via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 13:53, David Sweeris wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 09:54, David Zarz

Re: [swift-dev] Value-type bound protocols?

Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 13, 2017, at 11:56 AM, David Zarzycki via swift-dev > wrote: > > > >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 13:53, David Sweeris wrote: >> >> >>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 09:54, David Zarzycki via swift-dev >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> As a part of a research project that

Re: [swift-dev] Value-type bound protocols?

> On Sep 13, 2017, at 13:53, David Sweeris wrote: > > >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 09:54, David Zarzycki via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> As a part of a research project that I’m working on, I’ve started bumping >> into the need for value-type bound protocols (as opposed to the existi

Re: [swift-dev] Value-type bound protocols?

> On Sep 13, 2017, at 09:54, David Zarzycki via swift-dev > wrote: > > Hello, > > As a part of a research project that I’m working on, I’ve started bumping > into the need for value-type bound protocols (as opposed to the existing > class bound protocols). Is this something that would be wor

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.04 (master) #502

Looks like it crashed during shutdown. I’ll try to get a stack trace if it crashes again via https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/11896. > On Sep 13, 2017, at 12:59 AM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_04 [#502] > > Build URL: > https://ci.sw

[swift-dev] Value-type bound protocols?

Hello, As a part of a research project that I’m working on, I’ve started bumping into the need for value-type bound protocols (as opposed to the existing class bound protocols). Is this something that would be worth proposing formally? Or should I just keep the patch I have on my research branc

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #529

Looks like updating the module format number did not cause a rebuild of TestFoundation. Can you clean the workspace? > On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:30 AM, Ben Langmuir wrote: > > Thanks Arnold; if that doesn't do it I'll clean the workspace. > >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer >

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #529

Thanks Arnold; if that doesn't do it I'll clean the workspace. > On Sep 13, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer > wrote: > > It looks like TestFoundation was not rebuild. The failing test has passed on > incremental linux bots who rebuild TestFoundation. If the executable still > references

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #529

It looks like TestFoundation was not rebuild. The failing test has passed on incremental linux bots who rebuild TestFoundation. If the executable still references the removed array value witnesses I would not be surprised that it would fail. I suspect a clean build will make this test succeed. I