Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 - Long Test (master) #618

As for internal benchmarks: https://stash.sd.apple.com/projects/DEVTOOLS/repos/swift/pull-requests/117/overview > On Jul 29, 2016, at 9:11 PM, Michael Ilseman via swift-dev > wrote: > > Infrastructure problem? > > test-results/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lit-tests.xml' relative to > '/home/bu

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-evolution] [Swift 4] Organizing source stability

> On Jul 29, 2016, at 5:55 PM, Jacob Bandes-Storch wrote: > > Here are a few thoughts: > -swift=4 > -swift-version=4 -swift-version seems like the best option to me, but Jordan will have a strong opinion. I think he’s crazy busy with Swift 3 work until late next week. -Chris > -language-ve

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 - Long Test (master) #618

Infrastructure problem? test-results/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lit-tests.xml' relative to '/home/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-15_10-long-test' for the testing framework 'JUnit'. Did you enter a pattern relative to the correct directory? Did you generate the

Re: [swift-dev] clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-MMD'

-MMDWrite a depfile containing user headers On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Ted kremenek via swift-dev < swift-dev@swift.org> wrote: > -Wno-unused-variable would drop warnings about variables in *code* that > are not used. This is about a driver option that is not being u

Re: [swift-dev] clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-MMD'

-Wno-unused-variable would drop warnings about variables in *code* that are not used. This is about a driver option that is not being used. We should just not pass that driver option. I don't recall offhand what it does (or intends to). > On Jul 29, 2016, at 11:32 AM, Dave Abrahams via swif

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-evolution] [Swift 4] Organizing source stability

Here are a few thoughts: - -swift=4 - -swift-version=4 - -language-version=4 - a top-of-file "shebang"-style comment indicating the version, something like //#swift(4), mirroring the "#if swift" syntax On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Jul 29, 2016, at

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-evolution] [Swift 4] Organizing source stability

> On Jul 29, 2016, at 5:20 PM, Jacob Bandes-Storch via swift-evolution > wrote: > > Chris writes: > - Source stability features: These should be relatively small, but important. > For example, we need a “-std=swift3” sort of compiler flag. We may also add > a way to conditionally enable lar

[swift-dev] [Swift 4] Organizing source stability

Chris writes: > - *Source stability features: *These should be relatively small, but > important. For example, we need a “-std=swift3” sort of compiler flag. We > may also add a way to conditionally enable larger efforts that are under > development but not yet stable - in order to make it easie

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5601

This has been fixed as of 20minutes ago > On Jul 29, 2016, at 5:13 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx ___ swift-dev mailing list swift-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5601

Not mine, -Chris > On Jul 29, 2016, at 4:59 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > New issue found! > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx [#5601] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/5601/ > > Pro

Re: [swift-dev] Initial smoke test PR message confusion

I think we can do such a thing. +Mishal for a more definitive answer. The thing is that Mishal I think is trying to fix the {smoke,} test and merge and the normal test to set the smoke test flags so if one does: @swift-ci Please test and merge @swift-ci Please smoke test and merge swiftci can m

[swift-dev] clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-MMD'

I'm seeing this warning a lot recently. Can we a) drop that argument b) add -Wno-unused-variable to the clang command line, or c) is there a better fix? -- Dave ___ swift-dev mailing list swift-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5575

_nsErrorDomain is synthesized by the Clang importer. I wonder if that’s not happening reliably. - Doug > On Jul 29, 2016, at 9:33 AM, Jordan Rose wrote: > > [+Doug] I’ve seen this come up a few times too. Clearing the module cache > sometimes makes it go away, which seems really suspi

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5575

[+Doug] I’ve seen this come up a few times too. Clearing the module cache sometimes makes it go away, which seems really suspicious. I think we must have nondeterminism somewhere in error importing. Jordan > On Jul 29, 2016, at 02:56, Andrew Trick via swift-dev > wrote: > > I must be buildin

Re: [swift-dev] Initial smoke test PR message confusion

Do we have control of this message? Can we change the heading to something like “Please run required checks”. > On Jul 28, 2016, at 10:40 PM, Michael Gottesman via swift-dev > wrote: > > Hey everyone. > > From talking with various people I think there is some confusion around the > initial

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5577

I fixed this playground logger build error, but it looks like this run didn’t pickup the fix yet. -Andy > On Jul 29, 2016, at 3:03 AM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > New issue found! > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx [#5577] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremen

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - OS X (master) #5575

I must be building differently from the CI bot, because I’m hitting these failures trying to build playground support. I tried to fix the CI just by looking at the build log... /s/sptr/swift-xcode-playground-support/PlaygroundLogger/PlaygroundLogger_TestDriver/main.swift:19:1: error: use of unr

Re: [swift-dev] Implementing SE-0111: Remove type system significance of function argument labels

Just an update on this for anyone watching at home… this approach has worked out quite well. With some changes I merged earlier today, along with https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/3857 this feature is nearly complete, albeit behind a frontend

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 (master) #6946

This turned out to be a spurious system failure. I unnecessarily reverted and reapplied my patch. -Andy > On Jul 29, 2016, at 12:37 AM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-15_10 [#6946] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incrementa