Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] URLSession test fest!

2017-01-29 Thread Peter Tomaselli via swift-corelibs-dev
Hi all, another new person here. This sounded like a lot of fun so I figured I would try and pitch in! However, I’m unable to get off the ground getting the current tests running. I’m sure it’s something I’m doing wrong, since I am completely new to the project, but I’d love it if anyone had any

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] URLSession test fest!

2017-01-31 Thread Peter Tomaselli via swift-corelibs-dev
Rad, thanks Tony. I can run all the tests now. Hoping to have some time soon to dig in and see if I can make a contribution. Love that this thing is spinning up its own HTTP server for this — seems real fun. Cheers, Peter > On Jan 30, 2017, at 5:46 PM, Tony Parker wrote: > > I see what this

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] URLSession test fest!

2017-02-02 Thread Peter Tomaselli via swift-corelibs-dev
Following up on this… I’m wondering if anyone has any info on what happened with the (rather more elaborate) “loopback” server and set of tests from @danieleggert’s PR #299: https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/299

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] URLSession test fest!

2017-02-03 Thread Peter Tomaselli via swift-corelibs-dev
eaking the CI builds, causing much agony > to many! Can you tell me more about this solution you propose? > > > > Thanks! > > Pushkar N Kulkarni, > IBM Runtimes > > *Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability - Edsger W. Dijkstra* > > > > -swift-corelibs-dev-b

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] URLSession test fest!

2017-03-09 Thread Peter Tomaselli via swift-corelibs-dev
Just one outside data point on this: as someone who's been wanting to contribute to the test fest, I agree that being able to test against httpbin.org (or some other pre-existing server — as opposed to the loopback server) would make it much easier to make useful contributions. Not that the loo