Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] libdispatch Arch Linux

2016-08-15 Thread David P Grove via swift-corelibs-dev
Ryan Lovelett wrote on 08/14/2016 05:10:34 PM: > > However, the `dispatch_io` test is still failing. I've added the > test-suite.log once more. > Hi Ryan, The test that is failing creates a temporary directory, sets it to be read-only, and then attempts to write into the directory. I

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] libdispatch Arch Linux

2016-08-15 Thread Ryan Lovelett via swift-corelibs-dev
That seems about right. The tests run in a chroot, where the script is root, to ensure that I control dependencies and such. Not sure what I I can do about this test. 🤔 Thanks for the help Dave! On Mon, Aug 15, 2016, at 10:57 AM, David P Grove wrote: > Ryan Lovelett wrote on 08/14/2016 > 05:10:

[swift-corelibs-dev] JIRA workflow: "Resolved" -> "Verify"?

2016-08-15 Thread Jordan Rose via swift-corelibs-dev
Hi, swift-dev et al (but especially Ted). I’ve recently noticed that our JIRA workflow has been a bit confusing. We currently have five “statuses": 1. Opened: This bug has been filed. 2. In Progress: Someone is actively working on this bug. (Not everyone has been bothering to set this, but it se

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] [swift-build-dev] JIRA workflow: "Resolved" -> "Verify"?

2016-08-15 Thread Daniel Dunbar via swift-corelibs-dev
Do we anticipate Verify being used in practice much? Would it be better to simplify the workflow and just have a single "Resolved/Closed/Done" state? If the originator does test the bug and find it isn't fixed, they can reopen. My guess is not that many people are going to actively look at the

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] [swift-build-dev] JIRA workflow: "Resolved" -> "Verify"?

2016-08-15 Thread Jordan Rose via swift-corelibs-dev
It hasn’t been used so much so far, but on the bugs where it has I like being able to tell the difference. I don’t think we’d poke people about verification like we do with Radar, though, so we will (and have) end up with a lot of bugs left in Resolved/Verify. Jordan > On Aug 15, 2016, at 10: