Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] [swift-users] Unable to build swift master branch

2017-04-02 Thread Michael Gottesman via swift-corelibs-dev
> On Apr 2, 2017, at 1:17 PM, Mohit Athwani wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > I just submitted my pull request: > https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/928 > > Now waiting for an admin to initiate tests. > > Thanks so m

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] [swift-users] Unable to build swift master branch

2017-04-02 Thread Mohit Athwani via swift-corelibs-dev
Hi Michael, I just submitted my pull request: https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/928 Now waiting for an admin to initiate tests. Thanks so much for your help! Cheers! Mohit On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Michael Gottesman wrote: > No worries. Just trying to be helpful =

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] [swift-users] Unable to build swift master branch

2017-04-02 Thread Michael Gottesman via swift-corelibs-dev
No worries. Just trying to be helpful = ). Michael > On Apr 2, 2017, at 12:27 PM, Mohit Athwani wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for checking up on me. I'm actually working on it right now. Will give > you an update in an hour or so... > > Cheers! > > > -- > Mohit Athwani > http://about.m

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] [swift-users] Unable to build swift master branch

2017-04-02 Thread Mohit Athwani via swift-corelibs-dev
Hi Michael, Thanks for checking up on me. I'm actually working on it right now. Will give you an update in an hour or so... Cheers! -- Mohit Athwani http://about.me/mohitathwani On Apr 2, 2017, 12:59 AM -0700, Michael Gottesman , wrote: > Hey Mohit! > > Were you able to build successfully? > >

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] [swift-users] Unable to build swift master branch

2017-04-02 Thread Michael Gottesman via swift-corelibs-dev
Hey Mohit! Were you able to build successfully? Michael > On Mar 30, 2017, at 4:29 PM, Michael Gottesman wrote: > > I was just informed that swift-corelibs-foundation is actually using ninja! > My bad! > > Still I would use the preset from the bots. It should just work. Otherwise, > you are