Yup, I think that makes sense.
I started an implementation a bit ago but didn’t get very far before I got
derailed onto some other topics. I’ll see if I can clean it up and put it
somewhere as a starting point.
- Tony
> On Jan 20, 2017, at 2:31 AM, Pushkar N Kulkarni wrote:
>
> Hi Tony, Will
Hi Sergej,
> On Jan 20, 2017, at 6:24 AM, Sergej Jaskiewicz via swift-corelibs-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone.
>
> I have a couple of questions about the core libraries that I think would be
> interesting to discuss.
>
> The first question is about documentation comments. From what I can se
> On Jan 20, 2017, at 7:55 AM, Ian Partridge via swift-corelibs-dev
> wrote:
>
> On Darwin, asynchronous usage of Operation is supported via KVO notifications.
>
> Because KVO is only available on Darwin platforms, swift-corelibs-foundation
> currently does not support asychronous Operations,
> On Jan 20, 2017, at 9:55 AM, Ian Partridge via swift-corelibs-dev
> wrote:
>
> On Darwin, asynchronous usage of Operation is supported via KVO notifications.
>
> Because KVO is only available on Darwin platforms, swift-corelibs-foundation
> currently does not support asychronous Operations,
On Darwin, asynchronous usage of Operation is supported via KVO
notifications.
Because KVO is only available on Darwin platforms,
swift-corelibs-foundation currently does not support asychronous
Operations, and there is a comment to that effect:
https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/
Hello everyone.
I have a couple of questions about the core libraries that I think would be
interesting to discuss.
The first question is about documentation comments. From what I can see in the
repos and what the core team members say, those libraries lack them a lot.
Maybe some of you have a
Hi Tony and Philippe,
I can now see that it is available in swift-3.1 branch. Sorry for the
confusion.
- Nethra Ravindran
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 3:53 AM, Tony Parker
wrote:
> Hi Nethra,
>
> If this was in master sometime before this past Tuesday, it should be
> included in the swift-3.1 bra
Hi Tony, Will, others: Apologies for bringing this up after a long time!I hope we still agree on the use of the "XDG Base Directory Specification". I did a quick read of the spec document. I am happy to file a JIRA report for this.The scope, as I understand it is: CoreFoundation will implement the