On 06/28/2018 12:01 PM, David Bright wrote:
> Author: dab
> Date: Thu Jun 28 17:01:04 2018
> New Revision: 335765
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/335765
>
> Log:
> Remove potential identifier conflict in the EV_SET macro.
>
>
> Differential Revision:
> https://bugs.fr
On 06/28/2018 12:06 PM, David A. Bright wrote:
> On 06/28/2018 12:01 PM, David Bright wrote:
>
>> Author: dab
>> Date: Thu Jun 28 17:01:04 2018
>> New Revision: 335765
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/335765
>>
>> Log:
>> Remove p
On 06/28/2018 02:04 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 6/28/2018 11:45 AM, Justin Hibbits wrote:
>> Hi David,
>> 18:02:13 /usr/src/bin/pwait/pwait.c:158: warning: initialized field
>> overwritten
>> 18:02:13 /usr/src/bin/pwait/pwait.c:158: warning: (near initialization
>> for '(anonymous).ext')
>>
>>
On 06/28/2018 01:45 PM, Justin Hibbits wrote:
>> Author: dab
>> Date: Thu Jun 28 17:01:04 2018
>> New Revision: 335765
>
> This breaks gcc builds, with the following errors:
Fixed in r335776.
Thanks to cem@ for a suggested fix (and to others that also suggested
alternative fixes) and to jhibbi
On 07/27/2018 09:53 PM, David Bright wrote:
> Author: dab
> Date: Sat Jul 28 02:53:36 2018
> New Revision: 336802
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/336802
>
> Log:
> Fix compilation error on some arches after r336761 & r336781.
>
> Another cast for printing an intmax_t was nee
On 07/30/2018 09:21 AM, David Bright wrote:
> Author: dab
> Date: Mon Jul 30 14:21:49 2018
> New Revision: 336905
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/336905
>
> Log:
> Correct possible misleading error message in kqtest.
>
> ian@ pointed out that in the test_abstime() function t
On 08/14/2018 02:58 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
> On 14/08/18 16:31, David Bright wrote:
>> Author: dab
>> Date: Tue Aug 14 19:31:06 2018
>> New Revision: 337814
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/337814
>> +kev_str = kevent_to_str(kev);
>
> It seems that this line is indente
On 11/27/18 12:34 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> As long as we were correcting indentation whitespace, it seems like it
> would have been good to go to tabs, per style(9), instead of spaces.
> Or are these considered contrib code from NetBSD?
A fair question. I'm not sure whether they should be conside
