Re: svn commit: r360983 - head/include

2020-05-12 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:39:17AM -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote: > Why not just use _Bool and leave the compatibility definition only for > C++ (#define _Bool bool)? There was such version in interim, see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24297?vs=on&id=70906#toc Exp-run reported issues with this variant

Re: svn commit: r360983 - head/include

2020-05-12 Thread Conrad Meyer
Why not just use _Bool and leave the compatibility definition only for C++ (#define _Bool bool)? On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:12 AM Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > Author: kib > Date: Tue May 12 18:12:20 2020 > New Revision: 360983 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/360983 > > Log: >

svn commit: r360983 - head/include

2020-05-12 Thread Konstantin Belousov
Author: kib Date: Tue May 12 18:12:20 2020 New Revision: 360983 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/360983 Log: Clear namespace pollution in include/malloc_np.h Do not include stdbool.h, it makes the header incompatible with some third-party code that typedefs bool manually.