Re: svn commit: r350764 - head/sys/arm64/arm64

2019-08-09 Thread Warner Losh
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 3:05 PM Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 10:01:31AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 12:57 AM Konstantin Belousov > > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 07:38:28PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019, 4:59 P

Re: svn commit: r350764 - head/sys/arm64/arm64

2019-08-09 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 02:29:49PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 10:01:31AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 12:57 AM Konstantin Belousov > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 07:38:28PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Au

Re: svn commit: r350764 - head/sys/arm64/arm64

2019-08-09 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 10:01:31AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 12:57 AM Konstantin Belousov > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 07:38:28PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019, 4:59 PM Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > >

Re: svn commit: r350764 - head/sys/arm64/arm64

2019-08-09 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 10:01:31AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 12:57 AM Konstantin Belousov > wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 07:38:28PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019, 4:59 PM Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > why do we nee

Re: svn commit: r350764 - head/sys/arm64/arm64

2019-08-09 Thread Warner Losh
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 12:57 AM Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 07:38:28PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019, 4:59 PM Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > why do we need COMPAT_43 for arm64 at all? I can't imagine an > > > application that would r

Re: svn commit: r350764 - head/sys/arm64/arm64

2019-08-08 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 07:38:28PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019, 4:59 PM Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > why do we need COMPAT_43 for arm64 at all? I can't imagine an > > application that would require this compatibility. > > > > A more general question is how far in t

Re: svn commit: r350764 - head/sys/arm64/arm64

2019-08-08 Thread Warner Losh
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019, 4:59 PM Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Hi, > > why do we need COMPAT_43 for arm64 at all? I can't imagine an > application that would require this compatibility. > > A more general question is how far in the future are we going > to carry COMPAT_43 for i386/amd64? > COMPAT_43 is a

Re: svn commit: r350764 - head/sys/arm64/arm64

2019-08-08 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Hi, why do we need COMPAT_43 for arm64 at all? I can't imagine an application that would require this compatibility. A more general question is how far in the future are we going to carry COMPAT_43 for i386/amd64? On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 05:48:07PM +, Warner Losh wrote: W> Author: imp W> D

svn commit: r350764 - head/sys/arm64/arm64

2019-08-08 Thread Warner Losh
Author: imp Date: Thu Aug 8 17:48:07 2019 New Revision: 350764 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/350764 Log: Make arm64 32-bit mode compile with COMPAT_43 The COMPAT_43 option isn't quite like the other compat options, and arm64 makes attempts to support it in 64-bit mode.