Especially since there can be multiple PCI registers that can be read in 1
32-bit transaction.
Warner
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019, 10:28 AM Scott Long wrote:
> It’s customary to refer to PCI configuration registers in the plural
> form. Would
> you mind changing back from “register” to “registers”?
>
> On Jun 17, 2019, at 11:37 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote:
>
> On 2019-06-17 19:27, Scott Long wrote:
>> It’s customary to refer to PCI configuration registers in the plural form.
>> Would
>> you mind changing back from “register” to “registers”?
>
> I didn't know that.
> Changed in r349150
> Reg
On 2019-06-17 19:27, Scott Long wrote:
It’s customary to refer to PCI configuration registers in the plural form.
Would
you mind changing back from “register” to “registers”?
I didn't know that.
Changed in r349150
Regards
--
Niclas
___
svn-src-head
It’s customary to refer to PCI configuration registers in the plural form.
Would
you mind changing back from “register” to “registers”?
Thanks,
Scott
> On Jun 17, 2019, at 10:54 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote:
>
> Author: zeising (doc,ports committer)
> Date: Mon Jun 17 16:54:51 2019
> New Revisio
Author: zeising (doc,ports committer)
Date: Mon Jun 17 16:54:51 2019
New Revision: 349146
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/349146
Log:
pci.4: wordsmith and add missing words
Add missing words after PCI in the description of the PCIOCWRITE and
PCIOCATTACHED ioctls.
Use sing
