Re: svn commit: r313008 - head/tests/sys/geom/class/gate

2017-02-01 Thread Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)
> On Jan 31, 2017, at 07:10, Alan Somers wrote: > > I think wait_for_ggate_device should also be used at line 32, which > calls "ggatec create". > -Alan Yes, you’re right. If I add in the wait_for_ggate_device call, then I can get rid of the other for loops with retry logic in them. I’

Re: svn commit: r313008 - head/tests/sys/geom/class/gate

2017-01-31 Thread Alan Somers
I think wait_for_ggate_device should also be used at line 32, which calls "ggatec create". -Alan On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Ngie Cooper wrote: > Author: ngie > Date: Tue Jan 31 06:12:51 2017 > New Revision: 313008 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/313008 > > Log: > Wait fo

svn commit: r313008 - head/tests/sys/geom/class/gate

2017-01-30 Thread Ngie Cooper
Author: ngie Date: Tue Jan 31 06:12:51 2017 New Revision: 313008 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/313008 Log: Wait for /dev/ggate* to appear after calling `ggatel create` in :ggatel_{file,md} The test assumed that `ggatel create` created a device on completion, but that's